The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme Narzo 70 and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The Narzo 70 leans on MediaTek's Dimensity 7050, while the Edge 50 Fusion boasts Qualcomm's Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (or Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in LATAM). This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International) offers a more efficient and generally faster experience than the Dimensity 7050, coupled with significantly faster 68W charging. While the Narzo 70 is a capable device, the Fusion’s superior charging and chipset give it an edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 25 | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 27 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Olive Green, Sky Blue | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | RMX3869 | XT2429-1 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
Realme Narzo 70
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable Realme software experience
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Less efficient Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Display brightness likely lower than Fusion
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- Faster Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International) chipset
- Significantly faster 68W charging
- Brighter display (1322 nits)
- Excellent battery life (12:40h active use)
- May be slightly more expensive
- LATAM version uses Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (performance downgrade)
- Software experience can be divisive
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 1322 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight – a crucial advantage over the Narzo 70, which lacks published brightness data. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Fusion’s higher brightness suggests a more premium viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling won’t be as power-efficient as on flagship models, but the Fusion’s superior brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond sensor resolution, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the focus should be on image processing and lens quality. Both phones likely employ similar sensor sizes for their main cameras, but the Snapdragon’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally offers more sophisticated image processing capabilities. The Narzo 70’s camera performance will likely be adequate, but the Edge 50 Fusion has the potential for more detailed and dynamic images, especially in challenging lighting conditions. We'll assume both phones have similar secondary cameras, and avoid focusing on the typically low-quality 2MP macro lenses.
Performance
The chipset is where the most significant difference lies. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (International) features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, built on a 4nm process. This translates to better power efficiency and sustained performance compared to the Realme Narzo 70’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s CPU configuration (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) offers a slight clock speed advantage over the Narzo 70’s (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), but the 4nm process is the key differentiator. However, it's crucial to note that LATAM versions of the Edge 50 Fusion use the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, which represents a significant performance step down and makes the Narzo 70 a more competitive option in that region.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 68W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Realme Narzo 70’s 45W charging takes 27 minutes for the same milestone. While the Edge 50 Fusion’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 12:40h suggests excellent battery life. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s efficiency further contributes to longer runtimes. The Narzo 70 will likely offer respectable battery life, but the Fusion’s faster charging and potentially larger capacity make it the more convenient option.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70 if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you value faster performance, quicker charging (68W vs 45W), and a brighter, more vibrant display. The Fusion is the better all-rounder for users who demand a smoother, more responsive experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s 4nm process is significantly more efficient than the Dimensity 7050’s 6nm node. This translates to lower heat generation during demanding tasks like gaming. While some throttling is inevitable, the Edge 50 Fusion is expected to maintain higher sustained performance for longer periods compared to the Narzo 70.
❓ What is the real-world difference between the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 versions of the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion?
The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, found in LATAM versions of the Edge 50 Fusion, is a substantial downgrade from the 7s Gen 2. Expect significantly slower CPU and GPU performance, impacting gaming, multitasking, and overall responsiveness. If you're in LATAM, the Narzo 70 becomes a much more competitive option.
❓ How does the 45W charging on the Realme Narzo 70 compare to the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion in terms of daily use?
The 68W charging on the Edge 50 Fusion is considerably faster, topping up to 50% in just 15 minutes versus 27 minutes for the Narzo 70. This difference is noticeable in daily use, allowing for quicker top-ups when you're short on time. The Narzo 70's charging isn't slow, but the Fusion offers a more convenient experience.
