The Realme Narzo 70 Turbo and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Narzo 70 Turbo focuses on raw processing power with the newer Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes a balanced experience with a focus on battery endurance and faster charging. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing quick charging and all-day battery life, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice. Its 68W charging significantly reduces downtime, and its 10:28h active use score demonstrates excellent endurance. However, gamers and power users may find the Narzo 70 Turbo's Dimensity 7300 Energy a more appealing option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 09 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 16 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 74.7 x 7.6 mm (6.37 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 120Hz, HDR, 600 nits (typ), 2000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Turbo Yellow, Turbo Green, Turbo Purple | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX5003 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | ₹ 14,625 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme Narzo 70 Turbo
- Potentially better sustained performance due to 4nm Dimensity 7300 Energy.
- More high-performance CPU cores for multi-tasking.
- Likely more affordable price point.
- Slower charging speed (45W vs 68W).
- Battery life is unknown and potentially lower than the Edge 40 Neo.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use).
- Significantly faster charging (68W, 50% in 15 min).
- Brighter display (1073 nits).
- Dimensity 7030 may throttle under sustained load.
- Fewer high-performance CPU cores.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors. While the Narzo 70 Turbo’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness advantage is significant. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from its higher peak brightness, offering a more vibrant and readable experience in direct sunlight. We lack information on panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) for the Narzo 70 Turbo, making a complete comparison difficult, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are absent for both devices. This makes a direct comparison challenging. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature capable main sensors. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), it’s difficult to declare a winner. The absence of details suggests neither phone is targeting camera enthusiasts.
Performance
The Realme Narzo 70 Turbo utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo employs the Dimensity 7030 (6nm) with two Cortex-A78 cores at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7300 Energy should offer improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7030. The Narzo 70 Turbo’s four high-performance cores versus the Edge 40 Neo’s two suggest a potential advantage in multi-threaded tasks. However, real-world performance will depend on thermal management and software optimization.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use. Its 68W wired charging is significantly faster than the Narzo 70 Turbo’s 45W, allowing for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Narzo 70 Turbo reaches 50% charge in 30 minutes. While the Narzo 70 Turbo’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Edge 40 Neo’s combination of endurance and rapid charging provides a more convenient user experience, especially for those who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo if you need a phone optimized for sustained performance in demanding applications like gaming or video editing, and are willing to trade some battery life for that extra processing muscle. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a phone that excels in everyday tasks, offers exceptional battery life, and can be rapidly recharged, making it ideal for users on the go.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7300 Energy in the Narzo 70 Turbo get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7300 Energy should help mitigate thermal throttling compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7030 in the Edge 40 Neo. However, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. Realme’s thermal management implementation will be crucial in determining actual performance under load. Without testing, it's difficult to say definitively, but the chip's efficiency is a positive sign.
❓ How much faster is the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo compared to the 45W charging on the Narzo 70 Turbo in real-world use?
The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging can reach 50% in 15 minutes, while the Narzo 70 Turbo takes 30 minutes. This translates to a significant time saving, especially for quick top-ups. For a full charge, the Edge 40 Neo will likely complete in under an hour, while the Narzo 70 Turbo will take considerably longer.
❓ Is the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's battery life significantly better than other phones in its price range?
The 10:28h active use score for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is excellent for a mid-range phone. Many competitors struggle to exceed 8 hours of active use. This suggests the Edge 40 Neo’s battery optimization and the Dimensity 7030’s efficiency contribute to its impressive endurance.
