The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme Narzo 70 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both devices pack powerful Mediatek Dimensity chipsets and promise a premium experience without the flagship price tag. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which phone offers the best balance of performance, battery life, and features.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging and 1283 nits peak brightness provide a tangible advantage. However, the Narzo 70 Pro remains a compelling option for those seeking a slightly more efficient chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 19 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 19 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 2000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0" | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Gold | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | RMX3868 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Realme Narzo 70 Pro
- Potentially better thermal management due to 6nm process
- Competitive Mediatek Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Likely a more affordable price point
- Slower 67W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than the Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Significantly brighter 1283 nits display
- Longer active use battery life (10:38h)
- 4nm process may run slightly warmer under sustained load
- Potentially higher price compared to the Narzo 70 Pro
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1283 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor use, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Narzo 70 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, the Redmi’s brightness level sets a high bar. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely utilizes an AMOLED panel, common in this price range, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to conserve battery, but the Redmi’s brightness will be a key differentiator for many users.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device beyond the chipset data, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is known for its 200MP main sensor (outside of provided data), which suggests a focus on high-resolution photography. The Narzo 70 Pro’s camera capabilities are less clear, but it’s reasonable to expect a capable main sensor. Image processing algorithms will play a crucial role in differentiating the two, with Xiaomi typically favoring vibrant, saturated colors, while Realme often aims for a more natural look. The absence of information regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance.
Performance
Both phones are powered by Mediatek Dimensity chipsets, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ features the more advanced Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4nm) compared to the Narzo 70 Pro’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 4nm process of the 7200 Ultra generally translates to improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under heavy load. The Redmi’s CPU configuration – 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 – offers a slight clock speed advantage over the Narzo 70 Pro’s 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. While both utilize octa-core architectures, the newer Cortex-A715 cores in the Redmi are expected to deliver better single-core performance, impacting app launch speeds and responsiveness. The Narzo 70 Pro’s 6nm process might offer a slight edge in thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ shines in the battery department with a reported active use score of 10:38h, indicating excellent real-world endurance. While the Narzo 70 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Redmi’s score is a strong indicator of optimized power management. Crucially, the Redmi supports 120W wired charging, capable of fully charging the device in just 19 minutes. The Narzo 70 Pro’s 67W charging, while still fast, takes considerably longer to reach 100%, achieving only 50% charge in the same 19-minute timeframe. This difference in charging speed is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70 Pro if you prioritize a potentially cooler-running device due to its 6nm process and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging, a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a longer active use battery life as demonstrated by the 10:38h score.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7200 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ get noticeably hotter than the Dimensity 7050 during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the 4nm process of the Dimensity 7200 Ultra is more efficient, it can still generate heat under sustained load. The Narzo 70 Pro’s 6nm process might offer slightly better thermal headroom, but the Redmi’s more powerful GPU could offset this. Real-world temperatures will depend on the game, settings, and ambient temperature. Both phones will likely experience some throttling to manage heat.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ compared to the 67W charging on the Narzo 70 Pro in a typical use case?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ can fully charge in 19 minutes, while the Narzo 70 Pro only reaches 50% in the same timeframe. This means a complete charge on the Redmi takes approximately 30-40 minutes less than the Narzo 70 Pro, offering a significant time saving for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speeds (2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz) between the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and Narzo 70 Pro noticeable in everyday tasks?
The difference in clock speed is relatively small and unlikely to be noticeable in most everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging. However, the newer Cortex-A715 cores in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ will provide a slight performance boost in CPU-intensive applications and multitasking scenarios.
