The Realme Narzo 70 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take different approaches. The Narzo 70 Pro focuses on a balanced package, while the Poco X6 Pro aggressively prioritizes raw processing power with the Dimensity 8300 Ultra.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset provides a significant performance advantage, translating to smoother multitasking and superior gaming capabilities. While the Narzo 70 Pro offers respectable performance, the X6 Pro’s extra horsepower justifies the slight price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 19 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 19 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 2000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0" | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Gold | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | RMX3868 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Realme Narzo 70 Pro
- Faster initial charging (0-50%)
- Potentially more efficient chipset (6nm)
- Likely more affordable price point
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 7050)
- Display brightness likely lower than Poco X6 Pro
- Limited camera details available
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Significantly more powerful chipset (Dimensity 8300 Ultra)
- Brighter display (1148 nits)
- Longer battery life (11:46h active use)
- Slightly slower full charge time (45 minutes)
- Potentially higher price
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Narzo 70 Pro. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win. Details regarding the Narzo 70 Pro’s panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate) are currently unavailable, making a complete assessment difficult, but the X6 Pro’s brightness is a concrete advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information beyond 'Photo/Video' capabilities is lacking for the Narzo 70 Pro. The Poco X6 Pro’s camera performance will depend heavily on its main sensor size and aperture, as well as image processing algorithms. Without specific details on the Narzo 70 Pro’s camera hardware, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. We can assume both will offer standard features like night mode and portrait mode, but the X6 Pro likely has an edge due to its more powerful ISP within the Dimensity 8300 Ultra.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Narzo 70 Pro’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 8300 Ultra features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core alongside 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 cores – versus the Narzo’s 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 4nm process node of the 8300 Ultra also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to a noticeably smoother experience in demanding games and applications for the Poco X6 Pro.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a strong battery performance with an active use score of 11:46h, indicating excellent endurance. Both phones offer 67W wired charging, but the Poco X6 Pro achieves a full charge in 45 minutes, while the Narzo 70 Pro takes 19 minutes to reach 50%. While the Narzo 70 Pro charges faster *to 50%*, the X6 Pro’s complete charge time is faster. The X6 Pro’s longer battery life, combined with relatively fast charging, makes it the more convenient option for all-day users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70 Pro if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on efficient power consumption and a potentially more refined software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming, demanding applications, and future-proofing, and are willing to accept potentially slightly shorter battery life in exchange.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is a powerful chip, its 4nm process node and Xiaomi’s thermal management solutions should mitigate overheating. However, expect some warmth during extended gaming. The Narzo 70 Pro’s 6nm Dimensity 7050 will likely run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ How does the 67W charging on both phones compare in real-world usage?
Both phones support 67W charging, but the implementation differs. The Narzo 70 Pro reaches 50% charge in 19 minutes, while the Poco X6 Pro takes 45 minutes for a full charge. This suggests the Narzo 70 Pro prioritizes a faster initial boost, while the X6 Pro focuses on a quicker complete charge.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture between the Dimensity 7050 and 8300 Ultra noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference may be minimal. However, the 8300 Ultra’s more modern and powerful CPU cores will result in snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience, especially when switching between demanding applications.
