The Realme Narzo 70 Pro and vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches. The Narzo 70 Pro focuses on a balanced feature set, while the iQOO Neo 7 Pro prioritizes raw processing power and incredibly fast charging. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid refueling, the vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a significant performance advantage, and the 120W charging is a game-changer. However, the Narzo 70 Pro remains a strong contender for those seeking a more balanced package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 19 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 19 | Available. Released 2023, July 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 197 g or 202 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 2000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0" | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Gold | Fearless Flame, Dark Storm |
| Models | RMX3868 | I2217 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 380 EUR |
Realme Narzo 70 Pro
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Likely attractive design (based on Realme's aesthetic)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the iQOO Neo 7 Pro
- Slower charging speeds
- Potentially less capable camera system
vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Likely superior camera performance
- Potentially higher price
- May generate more heat under sustained load
- Potentially less focus on design aesthetics
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature AMOLED panels (based on brand trends), the provided data doesn't specify display characteristics. However, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro, positioned as a performance-focused device, may benefit from a higher refresh rate for smoother gaming. The Narzo 70 Pro, lacking specific display details, likely targets a balance between color accuracy and power efficiency. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, but a direct comparison requires physical inspection.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro, being a higher-tier device, likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger primary sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). While the Narzo 70 Pro may offer a respectable camera experience, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and apertures makes a definitive statement impossible, but the iQOO's positioning suggests a more capable camera.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant step up from the Narzo 70 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon offers superior thermal efficiency, translating to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.19 GHz, provides a substantial single-core performance boost over the Narzo 70 Pro’s Cortex-A78 cores. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and graphically intensive games. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro will likely handle multitasking and resource-intensive apps with greater ease.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s 120W charging is the standout feature here. Achieving a 50% charge in just 8 minutes is a massive advantage, significantly reducing downtime. While the Narzo 70 Pro’s 67W charging is respectable (50% in 19 minutes), it pales in comparison. Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s more efficient chipset and faster charging mitigate the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Users who frequently top up their phones will greatly benefit from the iQOO’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70 Pro if you need a well-rounded device with a focus on design and a smooth, everyday experience. It's ideal for users who prioritize a balanced feature set and don't necessarily demand the absolute highest performance. Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro if you prefer uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding tasks, coupled with the fastest charging speeds available. This phone is geared towards power users and those who value minimizing downtime.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the iQOO Neo 7 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, it's built on a 4nm process, which offers improved thermal efficiency compared to older generations. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro likely incorporates advanced cooling solutions to mitigate heat buildup. However, some throttling may occur during extremely demanding games over extended periods, but it should be less pronounced than with older, less efficient chipsets.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Realme Narzo 70 Pro still considered fast charging in 2024?
67W charging is certainly fast and will still provide a reasonable charging speed. However, it's significantly slower than the 120W charging offered by the iQOO Neo 7 Pro. While 67W will get you from 0-50% in around 19 minutes, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro achieves the same in just 8 minutes. For users who prioritize minimizing charging time, the 67W charging may feel comparatively slow.
❓ Does the Dimensity 7050 in the Narzo 70 Pro support advanced gaming features like ray tracing?
The MediaTek Dimensity 7050 does not natively support hardware-accelerated ray tracing. While it can handle most mobile games, it won't deliver the same visual fidelity as devices with dedicated ray tracing capabilities. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro, with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, also lacks dedicated ray tracing hardware, so this isn't a differentiating factor between the two.
