The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme Narzo 70 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A55 are two strong contenders vying for your attention. The Narzo 70 Pro focuses on rapid charging and a competitive chipset, while the Galaxy A55 prioritizes battery endurance and Samsung’s established software ecosystem. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a polished software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice. Its 13:27h active use score significantly outperforms what we’d expect from the Narzo 70 Pro, and the Exynos 1480 offers a solid performance profile. However, the Narzo 70 Pro’s 67W charging is a compelling advantage for those who value speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 19 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 19 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 2000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0" | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Gold | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | RMX3868 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Realme Narzo 70 Pro
- 67W SuperVOOC charging for incredibly fast top-ups
- Potentially higher CPU clock speeds for demanding tasks
- Competitive chipset offering good performance for the price
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Galaxy A55
- Less established software support and ecosystem
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Exceptional 13:27h active use battery life
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Samsung’s robust software support and ecosystem
- Slower 25W charging speed
- Potentially more expensive than the Narzo 70 Pro
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits, compared to an unstated peak brightness for the Narzo 70 Pro. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, Samsung’s display technology often incorporates refinements in color accuracy and viewing angles. The A55’s brightness advantage is particularly beneficial for media consumption and gaming. We expect the Narzo 70 Pro to have a standard refresh rate, while the A55’s refresh rate is not specified, but is likely 120Hz, offering smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Samsung generally excels in image processing, delivering consistently pleasing results. The A55 likely benefits from Samsung’s advanced computational photography algorithms. The Narzo 70 Pro’s camera performance will heavily rely on the quality of its primary sensor and image processing pipeline. We can assume both phones will include a standard array of lenses, but the A55’s reputation for camera quality gives it a slight edge. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A55 would further enhance its low-light photography capabilities.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480, fabricated on a 4nm process, holds a theoretical advantage in power efficiency over the Realme Narzo 70 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The A55’s CPU configuration – 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – is clocked higher than the Narzo 70 Pro’s 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, suggesting potentially faster single-core performance. However, the Narzo 70 Pro’s core count is different, with 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores versus the A55’s 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This difference in core configuration could impact multi-threaded workloads. The 4nm node of the Exynos 1480 should also result in less thermal throttling during sustained gaming sessions, though real-world testing is needed to confirm.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s standout feature is its impressive 13:27h active use battery life. This demonstrates superior power efficiency, likely stemming from the 4nm Exynos 1480 chipset and optimized software. The Realme Narzo 70 Pro, while offering a competitive 67W wired charging (50% in 19 minutes), will likely require more frequent charging due to a potentially smaller battery capacity (unspecified). The A55’s 25W charging is slower, but the extended battery life mitigates this drawback. Users prioritizing convenience will appreciate the Narzo 70 Pro’s rapid charging, while those seeking all-day endurance will favor the A55.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70 Pro if you need blazing-fast 67W charging and prioritize a slightly more aggressive CPU clock speed for demanding tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer exceptional battery life, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and the long-term software support and ecosystem benefits that Samsung provides.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1480, built on a 4nm process, is generally efficient and well-managed. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, it’s unlikely to experience significant throttling compared to less efficient chipsets. Samsung’s thermal management solutions are also typically effective.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Narzo 70 Pro compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
Realme typically uses its proprietary SuperVOOC charging protocol. While some PD chargers *may* work at reduced speeds, it’s best to use the included charger or a Realme-certified SuperVOOC charger to achieve the full 67W charging speed. Using a non-compatible charger could result in slower charging or potential compatibility issues.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Realme UI and Samsung One UI?
Samsung’s One UI is known for its feature-richness, polish, and long-term software support (typically 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security patches). Realme UI is more lightweight and customizable, but generally offers shorter software support cycles. One UI also benefits from tighter integration with Samsung’s ecosystem of devices.
❓ Will the Narzo 70 Pro receive regular security updates?
Realme’s update schedule is less predictable than Samsung’s. While Realme does provide security updates, they are often less frequent and for a shorter duration compared to Samsung’s commitment to long-term software support. This is a key consideration for users prioritizing security and longevity.
