The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme Narzo 70 Pro and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of performance and affordability. This comparison dissects their key specifications, focusing on the chipset differences, display capabilities, and charging speeds to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Realme Narzo 70 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7050, while built on a 6nm process, delivers a solid experience, and the 67W charging is noticeably quicker. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion’s brighter display and potentially more efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International version) make it a strong contender.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 19 | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 19 | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 2000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0" | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Gold | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | RMX3868 | XT2429-1 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
Realme Narzo 70 Pro
- Faster charging speed (67W)
- Potentially higher CPU clock speeds
- Solid all-around performance
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- 6nm process may lead to more thermal throttling
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- Brighter display (1322 nits)
- More efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International version)
- Longer battery life (12:40h active use)
- Regional chipset variation (Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in LATAM)
- Slightly slower charging speed
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion boasts a significant advantage in display brightness, reaching a measured 1322 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Narzo 70 Pro’s display specs are not provided, it’s unlikely to match this peak brightness. The Edge 50 Fusion’s panel likely benefits from its higher peak brightness for HDR content as well. We can assume both devices utilize AMOLED panels given the market segment, but the Motorola’s brightness is a clear differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely target the mid-range segment, meaning image quality will heavily rely on software processing. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the main sensor would be a crucial factor, but this information is unavailable. We can assume both will feature multi-camera setups, but the quality of secondary lenses (ultrawide, macro) is often less impactful than the primary sensor. Focusing on the main sensor’s megapixel count and aperture would be key to assessing potential low-light performance.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme Narzo 70 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, however, has a regional split: the International version gets the Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), while the LATAM version receives the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm). The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers better power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7050. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 also features a slightly faster core clock speed (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78) than the Narzo 70 Pro, suggesting a potential edge in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Narzo 70 Pro’s Cortex-A78 cores are clocked higher, which could offset some of the Snapdragon’s efficiency gains.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion demonstrates a strong real-world battery performance, achieving 12 hours and 40 minutes of active use. The Realme Narzo 70 Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 67W wired charging (50% in 19 minutes) is slightly slower than the Motorola’s 68W charging (50% in 15 minutes). The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s 4nm process could contribute to better battery efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity difference. The faster charging speed of the Motorola is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70 Pro if you need consistently responsive performance for everyday tasks and gaming, and value the speed of 67W charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you prioritize a brighter, more visible display, especially outdoors, and potentially longer battery life with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International version). Be aware of the chipset variation based on region for the Motorola.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Dimensity 7050?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2's 4nm process generally leads to better thermal efficiency. While both phones will experience some heat during prolonged gaming, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (International version) is likely to maintain more consistent performance with less throttling due to its more efficient chipset.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed (67W vs 68W) between the Realme Narzo 70 Pro and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion significant in real-world use?
While the difference of 1W seems minimal, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion charges slightly faster to 50% (15 minutes vs 19 minutes). This can be noticeable for users who frequently need a quick top-up, saving a few minutes per charge cycle.
❓ What impact does the regional chipset variation (Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 1) have on the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion's performance?
The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, found in the LATAM version of the Edge 50 Fusion, is significantly less powerful and efficient than the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. Users in LATAM will experience noticeably slower performance in demanding tasks and potentially shorter battery life compared to the International version.
❓ How does the display quality of the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion compare to other phones in its price range?
With a peak brightness of 1322 nits, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion’s display is exceptionally bright for its price range. This puts it ahead of many competitors, offering excellent visibility even in challenging lighting conditions.
