The Realme Narzo 60 and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Narzo 60 focuses on delivering a balanced experience with a modern design, while the Poco F5 Pro aims for near-flagship performance at a competitive price. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power compared to the Narzo 60’s Dimensity 6020, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Narzo 60 provides a solid, efficient experience for everyday use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 06 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 15 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), eco leather or plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 72.9 x 7.9 mm (6.29 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mars Orange, Cosmic Black | Black, White |
| Models | RMX3750 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 60
- Potentially more power-efficient chipset (Dimensity 6020)
- Modern design aesthetic
- Competitive price point
- Significantly less powerful processor than the Poco F5 Pro
- Slower charging speeds
- Limited display specifications
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price
- May run warmer under sustained load
- Larger size and weight (likely)
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1059 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Narzo 60. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays have an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, the F5 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The Narzo 60’s display specifications are currently limited, making a detailed comparison of color accuracy and panel technology difficult, but it’s likely to be a standard LCD or AMOLED panel geared towards efficiency rather than top-tier visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Poco F5 Pro, being positioned as a higher-tier device, likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Narzo 60’s camera is likely to be adequate for everyday photography, but will likely fall short of the F5 Pro’s potential for low-light performance and dynamic range. We can assume the F5 Pro will offer more advanced video recording features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a flagship-level processor, featuring an octa-core configuration with a high-clocked Cortex-X2 prime core at 3.0 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Narzo 60’s MediaTek Dimensity 6020 (7nm). The Dimensity 6020, while capable, is designed for efficiency and targets the mid-range segment. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s 4nm process node provides superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The CPU architecture difference – Cortex-X2 vs Cortex-A76 – further emphasizes the F5 Pro’s performance advantage. While RAM specifications are not provided, the F5 Pro is likely to benefit from faster LPDDR5X RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Narzo 60). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco F5 Pro supports 67W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes), 30W wireless charging (50% in 32 minutes), and supports PD3.0 and QC3+ standards. The Narzo 60 offers 33W wired charging (50% in 29 minutes) and lacks wireless charging. This means the F5 Pro offers significantly faster top-ups, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need to recharge quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 60 if you need a reliable daily driver with a focus on efficiency and a modern aesthetic, and aren't heavily invested in demanding mobile gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you prioritize performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value the convenience of significantly faster wired and wireless charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, Qualcomm implemented several optimizations to improve thermal efficiency compared to the original 8 Gen 1. The Poco F5 Pro also likely incorporates a robust cooling system. However, some throttling is still possible during extended, graphically intensive gaming. Expect slightly reduced frame rates after prolonged use, but generally manageable performance.
❓ How does the Dimensity 6020 in the Narzo 60 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
The Dimensity 6020 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. However, it won't deliver the same level of graphical fidelity or sustained performance as the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro. Expect some compromises in visual settings to maintain smooth gameplay.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Realme Narzo 60 sufficient for a typical user's needs?
33W charging is adequate for overnight charging or topping up the battery during downtime. However, it's significantly slower than the 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro. If you frequently need to quickly recharge your phone, the Narzo 60's charging speed may feel limiting.
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro support expandable storage via microSD card?
Unfortunately, the Poco F5 Pro does *not* support microSD card expansion. Users are limited to the internal storage option they choose at the time of purchase. This is a common omission in phones targeting this price range.
