The Realme Narzo 60 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but approach it with different strengths. The Narzo 60 focuses on delivering a solid all-around experience at a potentially lower price point, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes a premium display and faster charging speeds. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a vibrant display and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset and 68W charging significantly outperform the Narzo 60’s Dimensity 6020 and 33W charging. However, the Narzo 60 may appeal to budget-conscious buyers willing to trade speed for savings.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 06 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 15 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), eco leather or plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 72.9 x 7.9 mm (6.29 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mars Orange, Cosmic Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX3750 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme Narzo 60
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable MediaTek Dimensity 6020 chipset
- Decent all-around performance
- Slower 33W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Less powerful processor than the Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging
- Brighter 1073 nit display
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Potentially higher price
- May require more frequent charging if heavily used
- Software bloat (typical of Motorola)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Narzo 60 (brightness data unavailable, but likely lower given the price difference). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher brightness suggests a more advanced panel with potentially better color accuracy and contrast. Bezels are expected to be comparable, but the overall viewing experience favors the Motorola due to its superior luminance.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is likely to offer a more refined camera experience. While both phones likely feature a primary camera, the Edge 40 Neo’s image processing capabilities, coupled with a potentially larger sensor (speculation based on market positioning), should result in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Narzo 60’s camera is expected to be adequate for everyday use, but the Edge 40 Neo aims for a higher level of photographic quality. We anticipate both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and HDR, but the Edge 40 Neo’s video recording capabilities are likely to be more robust.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 represents a clear step up in processing power compared to the Realme Narzo 60’s Dimensity 6020. The 7030 features a faster CPU configuration – 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores versus the Narzo 60’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores – resulting in snappier application launches and smoother multitasking. Both phones utilize a 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cluster, but the 7030’s superior architecture and 6nm process (vs 7nm for the 6020) translate to better performance and potentially improved thermal efficiency. While both likely pair with 8GB of RAM, the Edge 40 Neo’s chipset will extract more performance from it.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. This is nearly twice as fast as the Realme Narzo 60’s 33W charging (50% in 29 minutes). While the Narzo 60’s battery capacity is not specified, the Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating of 80 hours and active use score of 10:28h demonstrate excellent battery life. The faster charging of the Edge 40 Neo mitigates any potential concerns about battery drain, making it a more convenient option for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 60 if you need a dependable daily driver with a focus on value and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications or fast charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more visually immersive experience with a brighter screen, faster charging, and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Dimensity 6020?
The Dimensity 7030, while more powerful, is fabricated on a 6nm process, which generally offers better thermal efficiency than the 7nm process of the Dimensity 6020. However, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. The Edge 40 Neo’s larger chassis and potentially more sophisticated cooling system are likely to manage temperatures more effectively, preventing significant throttling and maintaining consistent performance for longer periods.
❓ How does the charging speed difference (33W vs 68W) translate to real-world usage scenarios for the Realme Narzo 60 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo?
The 68W charging on the Edge 40 Neo provides a substantial time saving. A quick 15-minute charge can add enough power for several hours of use, ideal for users who frequently need a boost. The Narzo 60’s 33W charging is still respectable, but requires nearly double the time to achieve the same level of charge, making it less convenient for those with limited time.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A78 vs Cortex-A76) between the two phones noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both CPUs are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 7030 offer a performance advantage. This translates to slightly faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive user experience, particularly when multitasking between several applications. The difference may not be dramatic for basic usage, but it becomes more apparent with demanding apps.
