Realme Narzo 60 vs Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. Its Tensor G2 chip and Google’s image processing algorithms deliver superior photos and videos. However, the Realme Narzo 60 offers a compelling value proposition with faster charging and a potentially smoother experience for less demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 60 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 06 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 15 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), eco leather or plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 72.9 x 7.9 mm (6.29 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mars Orange, Cosmic Black | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | RMX3750 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Realme Narzo 60
- Faster 33W wired charging
- More affordable price point
- Potentially more efficient chipset for basic tasks
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Slower software updates and support
Google Pixel 7a
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Powerful Google Tensor G2 chip
- Clean and consistently updated Android experience
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Higher price point
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, compared to an unstated value for the Narzo 60. This brightness advantage translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Narzo 60’s panel specifications are unknown, the Pixel 7a’s OLED panel delivers vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (assumed based on Pixel A-series history) would also provide a smoother scrolling experience than the likely 60Hz panel on the Narzo 60, benefiting users who frequently browse social media or play casual games.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a major strength. While specific sensor details are missing for both phones, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a’s image processing excels in dynamic range, detail preservation, and low-light performance. The Narzo 60 likely relies more on hardware specifications, and without knowing the sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s dedicated image signal processor (ISP).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.85 GHz, offering significantly higher peak performance than the Realme Narzo 60’s Dimensity 6020 (7nm). The Tensor G2’s architecture, with its focus on AI and machine learning, excels in tasks like image processing and voice recognition. While the Dimensity 6020’s octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is capable for everyday use, it will struggle with demanding games and multitasking compared to the Pixel 7a. The Pixel 7a’s LPDDR5x RAM (assumed) will also contribute to faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting a larger battery capacity and optimized power management. While the Narzo 60 offers faster 33W wired charging (50% in 29 minutes), the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging, while slower, is supplemented by 7.5W wireless charging, offering added convenience. The Pixel 7a’s efficiency, combined with its larger battery, likely offsets the Narzo 60’s faster charging in real-world usage, providing a longer overall battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 60 if you need a phone primarily for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize fast charging and value for money. You’ll appreciate the 33W charging and the Dimensity 6020’s efficiency. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, a clean and consistently updated Android experience, and the power of Google’s AI features, even if it means sacrificing charging speed and potentially battery endurance.