The Realme Narzo 60 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices leverage MediaTek's Dimensity 7000 series, but subtle differences in chipset implementation, display technology, and battery performance create distinct user experiences. This comparison dives deep to determine which phone offers the best balance of features and value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly faster charging experience, the Realme Narzo 60 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7050, with its marginally higher clock speeds, provides a small but noticeable edge in demanding tasks, while the 67W charging is competitive. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s excellent battery endurance is a strong counterpoint.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 06 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 15 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, eco leather or plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g or 191 g (6.53 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Double-reinforced glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mars Orange, Cosmic Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX3771 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme Narzo 60 Pro
- Slightly faster CPU clock speeds for improved performance.
- Competitive 67W fast charging.
- Potentially better sustained performance for gaming.
- Battery life likely inferior to the Edge 40 Neo.
- Display brightness likely lower than the Edge 40 Neo.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Exceptional battery life with 10:28h active use.
- Bright and vibrant 1073 nit display.
- Fast 68W charging with a 15-minute 50% boost.
- Slightly slower CPU clock speeds compared to the Narzo 60 Pro.
- Performance may throttle more under sustained load.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight, a crucial advantage for outdoor users. While the Narzo 60 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to fall short of this brightness level. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel quality is further enhanced by its likely higher color accuracy and contrast ratio, making it a better choice for media consumption. We can infer that the Edge 40 Neo’s display is a key differentiator, catering to users who value visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the specifics are unknown. The absence of sensor size information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, given Motorola’s history, the Edge 40 Neo likely emphasizes computational photography and image processing for balanced, realistic results. The Narzo 60 Pro may lean towards more vibrant, social media-ready images. Without further details, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography.
Performance
Both phones utilize MediaTek’s Dimensity 7000 series, but the Narzo 60 Pro features the Dimensity 7050, clocked at 2.6 GHz for its Cortex-A78 cores, while the Edge 40 Neo uses the Dimensity 7030 with 2.5 GHz cores. This 100 MHz difference, though seemingly small, can translate to a slight performance advantage for the Narzo 60 Pro in CPU-intensive tasks. Both chipsets are built on a 6nm process, suggesting similar power efficiency. However, the Narzo 60 Pro’s potential for slightly higher sustained performance makes it more appealing to gamers and users who frequently run demanding applications. The RAM configuration (not specified) will also play a role, with LPDDR5x being preferable for faster data transfer speeds.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an 80-hour endurance rating. This suggests a highly optimized power management system and efficient components. The Narzo 60 Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 67W wired charging is comparable to the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging, with the latter claiming a 50% charge in 15 minutes. While both offer fast charging, the Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery life provides a more convenient user experience, reducing the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 60 Pro if you need a phone that can handle extended gaming sessions or multitasking without significant throttling. Its slightly more powerful chipset and fast charging are ideal for power users. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life and a bright, vibrant display for media consumption. The Edge 40 Neo excels in providing a consistently reliable experience without needing frequent top-ups.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo experience thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7030 is a capable chipset, sustained gaming can lead to some thermal throttling. The Edge 40 Neo’s thermal management system will mitigate this, but users may experience a slight performance dip after extended play. The Narzo 60 Pro, with its slightly more powerful Dimensity 7050, may handle heat marginally better.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Realme Narzo 60 Pro compare to the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo in real-world usage?
Both charging speeds are very similar. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo claims 50% charge in 15 minutes, and the Narzo 60 Pro should be comparable. The difference is negligible for most users; both phones will provide a significant charge boost in a short amount of time.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speed (2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz) between the Narzo 60 Pro and Edge 40 Neo noticeable in everyday tasks?
For typical everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the 100 MHz difference in CPU clock speed is unlikely to be noticeable. The difference becomes more apparent in CPU-intensive applications like video editing or demanding games.
