The Realme Narzo 50 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in their core components, particularly the chipset and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a more efficient processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging and Snapdragon 695 offer a noticeable advantage in daily usability and long-term performance, despite the Narzo 50's potentially lower price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 03 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Speed Blue, Speed Black | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | RMX3286 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 610 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Realme Narzo 50
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable MediaTek chipset
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Less power-efficient chipset (12nm)
- Likely more thermal throttling under load
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 695 (6nm)
- Better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency
- Potentially higher price
- May not offer a dramatically better camera experience
- Software experience can be divisive (MIUI)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness in nits or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on the underlying processing power impacting UI smoothness. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The absence of high refresh rates on either device suggests a focus on battery life over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695 typically includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP) than the Helio G96. This translates to better image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality and dynamic range. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features with limited practical utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a 6nm process. This smaller node size translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the Realme Narzo 50’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a slight clock speed advantage over the Narzo 50’s Cortex-A76 cores (2.05 GHz). This, combined with the more efficient process, means the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G will likely exhibit less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Narzo 50 will be adequate for everyday tasks, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G provides a more future-proof and responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging is a significant advantage. Xiaomi advertises a 50% charge in 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. The Realme Narzo 50’s 33W charging is considerably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 695’s superior efficiency means the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G will likely offer comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity. The faster charging speed significantly reduces downtime and enhances usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 50 if you prioritize maximizing value and are comfortable with a slightly less refined processor and slower charging speeds. It's ideal for users who primarily engage in casual smartphone tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value faster charging, a more power-efficient chipset, and a smoother overall experience, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. The 6nm process and improved thermal management will help prevent significant throttling during extended gaming sessions, unlike the Helio G96 in the Narzo 50 which is more prone to performance drops.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 33W charging on the Narzo 50 in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is substantially faster. Xiaomi claims 0-100% in 42 minutes, while the Narzo 50 will likely take well over an hour. This means you can quickly top up your phone during short breaks, making it much more convenient for users who are frequently on the go.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Helio G96 and Snapdragon 695 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference may not be immediately apparent. However, the Snapdragon 695’s smoother animations and faster app loading times will become noticeable when multitasking or switching between demanding applications. The Narzo 50 may exhibit slight lag in these scenarios.
