Realme continues to dominate the budget smartphone market with its Narzo series. The Narzo 50 and Narzo N55 are two compelling options, but which one offers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Narzo 50 edges out the N55 thanks to its more powerful Helio G96 chipset, offering noticeably better performance for gaming and demanding tasks. However, the N55 boasts slightly faster charging and potentially better battery optimization, making it a strong contender for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2023, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 03 | Available. Released 2023, April 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Speed Blue, Speed Black | Prime Black, Prime Blue |
| Models | RMX3286 | - |
| Price | About 610 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-31.8 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 257263 (v9)
GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6)
GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 50
- More powerful chipset (Helio G96)
- Better gaming performance
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Sleek design
- Slightly slower charging
- Battery optimization might not be as good as N55
Realme Narzo N55
- Excellent battery life (123h endurance rating)
- Faster charging (50% in 29 min)
- Potentially brighter display
- Good value for money
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G88)
- Lower gaming performance
- Camera might be less versatile
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a nominal contrast ratio of 1264:1, suggesting decent image quality. While specific display technology details are missing, expect similar viewing experiences. The Narzo N55 might have a slightly brighter display, but this needs confirmation.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are not fully detailed for either device. However, based on general knowledge, the Narzo 50 likely has a more versatile camera system with potentially better image processing due to the more powerful chipset. Expect decent image quality from both, but the Narzo 50 might offer slightly better results in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The Narzo 50's Helio G96 chipset is significantly more powerful than the N55's Helio G88. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The G96's Cortex-A76 cores provide a noticeable boost in CPU performance.
Battery Life
The Narzo N55 advertises an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting excellent battery optimization. While the Narzo 50's battery capacity is likely similar, the N55's software and chipset optimizations could lead to longer real-world usage. The N55 also has slightly faster charging (50% in 29 minutes) compared to the Narzo 50.
Buying Guide
The Realme Narzo 50 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and gaming. If you're a casual user who values long battery life and quick charging, the Realme Narzo N55 is a solid choice. Consider your budget and usage patterns when making your decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Realme Narzo 50 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Helio G96 chipset.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Realme Narzo N55 boasts an impressive endurance rating and potentially better battery optimization, making it the winner in this category.
❓ Are the cameras comparable?
While both offer decent camera performance, the Narzo 50 likely has a slight edge due to its more powerful chipset and potentially better image processing.
