The Realme Narzo series is known for offering impressive features at affordable prices. The Narzo 50 and Narzo 50A Prime are two contenders in this space, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme Narzo 50 is the clear winner, boasting a significantly more powerful chipset, faster charging, and generally better performance. While the Narzo 50A Prime is more budget-friendly, the Narzo 50's superior hardware justifies its slightly higher price for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2022, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 03 | Available. Released 2022, March 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.4 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Speed Blue, Speed Black | Black, Blue |
| Models | RMX3286 | RMX3516, RMX3517 |
| Price | About 610 EUR | About 120 EUR |
Realme Narzo 50
- Superior Performance (Helio G96)
- Faster 33W Charging
- Better Camera Quality
- More Responsive UI
- Slightly Higher Price
- Potentially Less RAM/Storage in Base Models
Realme Narzo 50A Prime
- More Affordable
- Decent Battery Life
- Sufficient for Basic Tasks
- Weaker Performance (Tiger T612)
- Slower 18W Charging
- Lower Camera Quality
- Can Feel Laggy with Multitasking
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch display, likely with a resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. However, the Narzo 50 might offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to potentially higher panel quality. Expect similar viewing experiences overall, suitable for everyday use and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Narzo 50 typically features a triple-camera setup with a 48MP main sensor, while the Narzo 50A Prime often has a 50MP main sensor. While megapixels aren't everything, the G96's image signal processor (ISP) in the Narzo 50 likely provides better image processing, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in low light. Video recording capabilities are also likely superior on the Narzo 50.
Performance
This is where the Narzo 50 truly shines. The Mediatek Helio G96 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Unisoc Tiger T612. Expect smoother app launches, faster multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Narzo 50. The Narzo 50A Prime will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate usage. However, the Narzo 50's 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the Narzo 50A Prime's 18W charging. This is a major advantage for users who value convenience.
Buying Guide
The Realme Narzo 50 is ideal for users who prioritize performance, smooth multitasking, and faster charging. It's a great choice for gamers and those who frequently use demanding apps. The Realme Narzo 50A Prime is best suited for users on a tight budget who primarily need a phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Realme Narzo 50A Prime good for gaming?
The Narzo 50A Prime can handle basic games, but it will struggle with more demanding titles. The Narzo 50 is a much better choice for gamers.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Realme Narzo 50 takes approximately 70-80 minutes to fully charge with its 33W charger, while the Narzo 50A Prime takes around 2.5-3 hours with its 18W charger.
