Realme's Narzo series consistently delivers impressive value in the budget smartphone market. The Narzo 50 and Narzo 50A are two contenders vying for your attention, offering different features and price points. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is the best fit.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme Narzo 50 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster processor, faster charging, and generally improved performance. While the Narzo 50A offers reverse charging and a slightly different design, the Narzo 50 provides a more premium experience for a small price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2021, September 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 03 | Available. Released 2021, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.5 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 570 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Speed Blue, Speed Black | Oxygen Blue, Oxygen Green |
| Models | RMX3286 | RMX3430 |
| Price | About 610 EUR | About 130 EUR |
Realme Narzo 50
- Faster Processor (Helio G96)
- 33W Fast Charging
- Better Camera Performance
- Smoother Gaming Experience
- Slightly Higher Price
- Design might be less unique than 50A
Realme Narzo 50A
- Lower Price
- 5W Reverse Charging
- Decent Battery Life
- Simple and Functional Design
- Slower Processor (Helio G85)
- 18W Charging
- Less Impressive Camera
- Can Struggle with Demanding Tasks
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch display, likely with an HD+ resolution. While the Narzo 50 might have slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to potentially better panel technology, the difference is unlikely to be drastic for everyday use. Expect similar viewing experiences for most users.
Camera Comparison
The Narzo 50 typically features a triple camera setup with a 48MP main sensor, while the Narzo 50A often has a 13MP main sensor. While megapixels aren't everything, the Narzo 50's sensor and likely improved image processing should result in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Both phones likely offer decent selfie cameras.
Performance
This is where the Narzo 50 truly shines. The Helio G96 chipset in the Narzo 50 is a substantial upgrade over the Helio G85 in the Narzo 50A. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Narzo 50. The G85 is adequate for basic tasks, but struggles with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, the Narzo 50's 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the Narzo 50A's 18W charging. The Narzo 50A's 5W reverse charging is a unique feature, allowing it to charge other devices in a pinch.
Buying Guide
The Realme Narzo 50 is ideal for users who prioritize performance, smooth multitasking, and faster charging. It's a great choice for gamers and those who frequently use demanding apps. The Realme Narzo 50A is better suited for users on a tighter budget who value reverse charging and don't require top-tier performance. It's a solid option for basic tasks and media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Realme Narzo 50A worth buying?
The Narzo 50A is a good option if you're on a very tight budget and prioritize reverse charging. However, the Narzo 50 offers significantly better performance for a small price increase.
❓ How much faster is the Narzo 50 than the Narzo 50A?
The Narzo 50's Helio G96 chipset is noticeably faster than the Narzo 50A's Helio G85, resulting in smoother performance in apps, multitasking, and gaming.
