Realme continues to dominate the budget smartphone market, and the Narzo 50 and C55 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme C55 edges out the Narzo 50 thanks to its brighter display, faster charging, and impressive battery endurance. While the Narzo 50 boasts a slightly more powerful chipset, the C55's overall package makes it the more appealing choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 03 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Speed Blue, Speed Black | Sun Shower, Rainy Night, Rainforest |
| Models | RMX3286 | RMX3710 |
| Price | About 610 EUR | ₹ 8,399 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-31.8 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 257263 (v9)
GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6)
GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 50
- Slightly more powerful chipset (Helio G96)
- Decent gaming performance
- 33W wired charging
- Less bright display
- Average battery life
- No standout camera features
Realme C55
- Brighter display (659 nits)
- Exceptional battery life (123h endurance)
- Faster charging (50% in 29 min)
- Stylish design
- Slightly less powerful chipset (Helio G88)
- Camera performance is average
Display Comparison
The Realme C55 takes the display crown. Its measured 659 nits peak brightness significantly surpasses what we'd expect from the Narzo 50. Both offer a 1264:1 contrast ratio, but the C55's brightness makes content pop more. The Narzo 50's display is perfectly adequate, but not as visually impressive.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two. Both offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is likely similar, relying on software processing. Specific camera specs are not detailed, so a direct comparison is difficult, but expect similar results.
Performance
The Narzo 50 holds a slight advantage in performance thanks to the Helio G96 chipset versus the C55's Helio G88. The G96's Cortex-A76 cores offer a performance boost, making it marginally better for demanding games and multitasking. However, in real-world usage, the difference is often negligible.
Battery Life
The Realme C55 shines in battery life. Its endurance rating of 123h is exceptional. The Narzo 50's battery life is respectable, but not in the same league. The C55 also features faster charging (33W with 50% in 29 minutes) compared to the Narzo 50's standard 33W charging.
Buying Guide
The Realme Narzo 50 is ideal for users prioritizing gaming performance and a slightly more powerful processor. The Realme C55 is a better fit for those who value a vibrant display, fast charging, and exceptional battery life for everyday use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Realme Narzo 50 has a slightly more powerful chipset, making it marginally better for demanding games. However, both phones offer a decent gaming experience.
❓ Does the Realme C55 support fast charging?
Yes, the Realme C55 supports 33W wired charging, reaching 50% charge in approximately 29 minutes.
