Realme's mid-range offerings are increasingly competitive, but choosing between the Narzo 50 and the 9 Pro+ requires careful consideration. The Narzo 50 focuses on delivering a solid experience at a budget-friendly price, while the 9 Pro+ aims higher with a more powerful chipset and faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset, built on a 6nm process, provides a significant performance uplift over the Narzo 50’s Helio G96, and the 60W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the Narzo 50 offers value, the 9 Pro+ delivers a more refined and future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 03 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Speed Blue, Speed Black | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | RMX3286 | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | About 610 EUR | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9)
GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 50
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging speed
- Likely inferior display quality
Realme 9 Pro+
- Significantly faster performance
- 60W fast charging
- Likely superior display and camera
- Better thermal management
- Higher price
- Potentially shorter battery life (offset by fast charging)
Display Comparison
The Realme 9 Pro+ boasts an unspecified 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting a typical AMOLED panel, while the Narzo 50’s display specifications are absent. Given the 9 Pro+'s positioning, we can infer a higher peak brightness and potentially better color accuracy. The absence of display details for the Narzo 50 suggests a more basic LCD panel, likely impacting outdoor visibility and color vibrancy. The 9 Pro+’s display is likely to offer a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond 'Photo/Video' are lacking for both devices. However, given the 9 Pro+'s higher tier, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger primary sensor and potentially Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). The Narzo 50 likely relies on a more basic camera setup. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the 9 Pro+ is expected to deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The inclusion of OIS on the 9 Pro+ would further enhance image stability and reduce blur.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro+’s Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Narzo 50’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 920 utilizes more efficient Cortex-A78 cores (2.5 GHz) compared to the Narzo 50’s Cortex-A76 cores (2.05 GHz), resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The 6nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 920 also translates to better thermal efficiency, minimizing performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. While both phones share 6x Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, the architectural advantages of the Dimensity 920 are clear.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+’s 60W wired charging, with an advertised 100% charge in 44 minutes, is a significant advantage over the Narzo 50’s 33W charging. This faster charging speed drastically reduces downtime, allowing users to quickly top up their battery. While the Narzo 50’s battery capacity is unspecified, the 9 Pro+ boasts an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting a well-optimized battery life despite the more powerful chipset. The faster charging of the 9 Pro+ effectively mitigates any potential battery life differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 50 if you prioritize affordability and a decent all-around experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you demand smoother performance for demanding apps and games, faster charging speeds, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek Dimensity 920 in the Realme 9 Pro+ prone to overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 920 is built on a 6nm process, which offers improved thermal efficiency compared to the 12nm Helio G96 in the Narzo 50. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, the 9 Pro+ is designed to manage temperatures effectively, minimizing performance throttling and providing a smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 60W charging on the Realme 9 Pro+ compared to the 33W charging on the Narzo 50 in real-world usage?
The 60W charging on the 9 Pro+ can realistically shave off around 20-30 minutes of charging time for a full charge compared to the Narzo 50’s 33W charging. This means you can go from near-empty to fully charged in approximately 44 minutes (advertised) on the 9 Pro+, while the Narzo 50 will likely take over an hour and fifteen minutes.
❓ Does the Realme 9 Pro+ support higher refresh rate displays for smoother scrolling and animations?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, Realme 9 Pro+ typically features a 120Hz display. This is a common feature in this price range and contributes to a significantly smoother visual experience compared to the standard 60Hz refresh rate likely found on the Narzo 50.
