The Realme Narzo 50 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches. The Narzo 50 Pro focuses on a balanced feature set, while the Poco F5 Pro aggressively targets performance with a previous-generation flagship chipset.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a significant leap in processing power compared to the Narzo 50 Pro’s Dimensity 920. However, the Narzo 50 Pro remains a strong contender for budget-conscious users seeking a well-rounded device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 18 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 31 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Black, White |
| Models | RMX3395, RMX3396 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Balanced feature set
- Decent battery life
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging speeds
- Potentially inferior display quality
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Faster 67W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Brighter and potentially higher-quality display
- Higher price tag
- Potential for thermal throttling under extreme load (though mitigated by 4nm process)
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1059 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Narzo 50 Pro. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, the F5 Pro’s superior brightness is a key advantage. Details regarding panel technology (e.g., AMOLED, refresh rate) are missing for the Narzo 50 Pro, but the F5 Pro’s brightness suggests a higher-quality panel overall.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, and image processing are lacking for both. Without this information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning of the Poco F5 Pro suggests a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with larger sensors and more advanced image stabilization (OIS). The absence of details on the Narzo 50 Pro’s camera suggests a more basic implementation. We can assume both will have a standard set of lenses, but the F5 Pro is likely to excel in low-light performance and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Realme Narzo 50 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 920 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a Cortex-X2 prime core at 3.0 GHz versus the Narzo’s Cortex-A78 at 2.5 GHz – and a more efficient 4nm manufacturing process. This translates to significantly faster processing speeds and improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The F5 Pro’s GPU will also deliver a far superior gaming experience. The Narzo 50 Pro’s Dimensity 920 is still capable, but it’s positioned firmly in the mid-range.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Poco F5 Pro supports 67W wired charging, reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes, and even offers 30W wireless charging (50% in 32 minutes). The Narzo 50 Pro is limited to 33W wired charging, taking 31 minutes to reach 50%. This faster charging on the Poco F5 Pro is a significant convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 50 Pro if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and value a more balanced feature set at a lower price point. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you prioritize demanding mobile gaming, content creation, and faster charging speeds, and are willing to spend a bit more for a near-flagship experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro get noticeably hotter than the Dimensity 920 during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is more powerful, the 4nm process helps mitigate heat. However, it *will* likely get warmer than the Narzo 50 Pro’s Dimensity 920 during prolonged, demanding gaming. The Poco F5 Pro’s thermal management system will be crucial in preventing significant throttling, but some heat is expected.
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro support PD3.0 and QC3+ charging, and can I use any USB-C charger to get the 67W speeds?
Yes, the Poco F5 Pro explicitly supports PD3.0 and QC3+ charging protocols. To achieve the full 67W charging speed, you'll need a charger that specifically supports these standards and delivers the required wattage. Using a standard USB-C charger may result in slower charging speeds.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Poco F5 Pro and Narzo 50 Pro noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and email, the difference in performance will be minimal. Both phones are more than capable of handling these workloads smoothly. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s advantage becomes apparent in more demanding applications like gaming, video editing, and multitasking.
