Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs Realme GT Neo 3T: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Neo 3T is the clear winner, boasting a significantly more powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset, faster 80W charging, and a brighter display. While the Narzo 50 Pro offers decent value, the GT Neo 3T delivers a superior overall experience for performance-focused users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 50 Pro | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 18 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 31 min | 80W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | RMX3395, RMX3396 | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Stylish Design
- Decent Performance for Everyday Tasks
- 33W Fast Charging
- Competitive Price
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Slower Charging
- Dimmer Display
- Lower Camera Performance
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 Chipset
- 80W SuperFast Charging
- Bright and Vibrant Display
- Excellent Performance
- Good Camera
- Potentially Higher Price
- Design might not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, offering significantly better visibility in sunlight. Its contrast ratio is also excellent (Infinite nominal). The Narzo 50 Pro's display is adequate but lacks the same level of vibrancy and brightness. Both likely use AMOLED panels, but the GT Neo 3T's implementation is superior.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the GT Neo 3T likely has a slight edge in image quality due to the superior processing power of the Snapdragon 870. Both likely feature a primary sensor around 64MP, but the GT Neo 3T's image processing algorithms are likely more advanced. Video recording capabilities are also likely better on the GT Neo 3T.
Performance
Here, the GT Neo 3T absolutely dominates. The Snapdragon 870 is a flagship-level chipset, providing significantly faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking compared to the Dimensity 920. Gaming performance will be noticeably better on the GT Neo 3T. The Narzo 50 Pro is capable for everyday use, but struggles with demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with an endurance rating of 118h. However, the GT Neo 3T's 80W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging speeds (likely reaching 100% in under 30 minutes). The Narzo 50 Pro's 33W charging is still respectable, but considerably slower.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Realme Narzo 50 Pro? It's ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a stylish design and decent performance for everyday tasks. Who should buy the Realme GT Neo 3T? Gamers, power users, and anyone seeking a fast-charging, high-performance smartphone will appreciate the GT Neo 3T's capabilities.