Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 68W charging, coupled with a respectable 10:28 hour active use battery life, outweighs the Narzo 50 Pro’s slightly older chipset. The Edge 40 Neo offers a more convenient and less anxiety-inducing charging experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 50 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 18 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 31 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX3395, RMX3396 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Potentially slightly better sustained performance with Dimensity 920
- May offer a more aggressive price point
- Realme UI offers extensive customization options
- Significantly slower 33W charging
- Battery life likely inferior to Edge 40 Neo
- Limited information on display brightness
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 68W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Excellent 10:28 hour active use battery life
- Brighter 1073 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Dimensity 7030 may offer slightly lower peak performance
- Motorola’s software is relatively stock, lacking some customization
- Camera performance details are limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Narzo 50 Pro, which lacks published brightness data. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher brightness and potentially better color calibration (based on Motorola’s track record) make it the superior choice for media consumption. Bezels are expected to be similar on both devices, given their market positioning.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited data. Both phones are expected to feature multi-camera systems, but specifics beyond the presence of 'Photo / Video' capabilities on the Edge 40 Neo are unavailable. Given the market segment, both will likely rely on software processing to enhance image quality. The absence of sensor size information makes a direct comparison impossible, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brand reputation suggests a focus on balanced image processing, while Realme often leans towards more saturated colors. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential.
Performance
Both the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo are powered by octa-core CPUs featuring the same core configuration: 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. However, the Narzo 50 Pro utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 920 (6nm), while the Edge 40 Neo employs the Dimensity 7030 (6nm). While the 7030 is newer, the 920 generally offers slightly better sustained performance due to its more mature thermal profile. However, the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday tasks. Both phones will likely perform well with standard Android workloads, but the Narzo 50 Pro may exhibit a slight edge in graphically intensive gaming.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery and charging department. Its 68W wired charging can replenish 50% of the battery in just 15 minutes, a substantial improvement over the Narzo 50 Pro’s 33W charging (50% in 31 minutes). Furthermore, the Edge 40 Neo achieves an impressive 10:28 hours of active use, indicating excellent battery optimization. While the Narzo 50 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s combination of fast charging and efficient power management provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 50 Pro if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks and don't mind slower charging. Its Dimensity 920, while a generation older, still offers a performance edge. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value fast charging, all-day battery life, and a more streamlined user experience. It’s the better option for everyday users and those who frequently find themselves away from a power outlet.