Realme Narzo 50 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: Which 5G Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter viewing experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the 746 nit display offers superior visibility. However, users focused on raw processing power for gaming or demanding apps may find the Narzo 50 5G’s Dimensity 810 a more appealing option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 50 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 18 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 24 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | RMX3572, RMX3571 | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 560 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 50 5G
- Potentially faster CPU performance with Dimensity 810
- 6nm process for improved efficiency
- Competitive price point
- Slower 33W charging
- Display specifications are unknown and likely inferior to the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- Brighter 746 nit display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slightly less powerful CPU compared to the Narzo 50 5G
- Snapdragon 695 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight. While the Narzo 50 5G’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also features an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a good quality panel. The lack of information on the Narzo 50 5G’s panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and refresh rate leaves it at a disadvantage in this category.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering little specific insight. Without sensor size or aperture details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience, potentially with better image processing algorithms. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and shouldn’t be a primary consideration for serious photographers.
Performance
The Realme Narzo 50 5G is equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 810, featuring a 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 core configuration. This chipset, built on a 6nm process, generally offers better CPU performance than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, which has a 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver setup. However, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and potentially better sustained performance due to thermal management. The 6nm process is shared between both chipsets, suggesting similar efficiency, but the Narzo 50 5G’s CPU clock speeds indicate a slight edge in burst performance.
Battery Life
Both the Realme Narzo 50 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a game-changer, achieving 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. The Narzo 50 5G’s 33W charging is considerably slower, making the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G the clear winner for users who value minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 50 5G if you need a phone that can handle more demanding tasks like mobile gaming or video editing, and you don't mind slower charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prioritize a vibrant display, incredibly fast charging, and a generally smoother everyday experience, even if it means slightly less raw processing horsepower.