Realme Narzo 50 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme Narzo 50 5G edges out the Redmi 11 Prime 5G thanks to its significantly faster charging and more powerful Dimensity 810 chipset. While the Redmi 11 Prime 5G offers a slightly more modern design and potentially better software support, the Narzo 50 5G provides a more responsive and enjoyable user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 50 5G | Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 18 | 2022, September 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 24 | Available. Released 2022, September 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Thunder Black, Chrome Silver, Meadow Green |
| Models | RMX3572, RMX3571 | - |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 180 EUR |
Realme Narzo 50 5G
- Faster Performance (Dimensity 810)
- 33W Fast Charging
- Good Value for Money
- Decent Gaming Performance
- 60Hz Display
- Potentially Less Software Support
- Design Less Premium
Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G
- Sleek Design
- Potentially Longer Software Support
- 120Hz Refresh Rate (Likely)
- Good Main Camera
- Slower Charging (18W)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Can Struggle with Demanding Games
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch FHD+ display, likely with a 120Hz refresh rate on the Redmi 11 Prime 5G and a standard 60Hz on the Narzo 50 5G. The Redmi 11 Prime 5G may offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to its more modern panel, but the difference will be subtle for most users. Expect similar viewing experiences overall.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi 11 Prime 5G typically features a 50MP main camera, while the Narzo 50 5G has a 48MP main camera. Image quality is generally comparable in good lighting conditions, but the Redmi 11 Prime 5G might offer slightly better dynamic range and detail thanks to its software processing. Low-light performance is likely similar on both devices.
Performance
The Realme Narzo 50 5G's Dimensity 810 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the Redmi 11 Prime 5G's Dimensity 700. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Narzo 50 5G handles demanding games with ease, while the Redmi 11 Prime 5G might struggle with higher settings.
Battery Life
The Redmi 11 Prime 5G has a 5000mAh battery, while the Narzo 50 5G also has a 5000mAh battery. However, the Narzo 50 5G's 33W fast charging is a significant advantage, allowing it to charge much faster than the Redmi 11 Prime 5G's 18W charging. This means less time plugged in and more time using your phone.
Buying Guide
The Realme Narzo 50 5G is ideal for users prioritizing performance and fast charging. If you're a gamer or frequently multitask, the Narzo 50 5G's chipset will be a noticeable upgrade. The Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G is a good choice for those who value a sleek design and potentially longer software support, and are less concerned about raw processing power.