Realme Narzo 50 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X4 GT emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster Dimensity 8100 chipset, faster charging, and brighter display. While the Narzo 50 5G is a decent budget option, the Poco X4 GT offers a superior performance and feature set for a slightly higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 50 5G | Xiaomi Poco X4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 18 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 24 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | RMX3572, RMX3571 | 22041216G, 22041216UG |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1190:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 747871 (v9) GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 50 5G
- Affordable
- 5G Connectivity
- Clean Software
- Decent Battery Life
- Lower Performance
- Slower Charging
- Less Bright Display
- Potentially Average Camera
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Powerful Dimensity 8100 Chipset
- Fast 67W Charging
- Brighter Display
- Good Value for Money
- Likely Better Camera
- Potentially More Bloatware (Xiaomi UI)
- Slightly Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Poco X4 GT boasts a brighter display (600 nits vs Narzo 50 5G's likely around 400-450 nits, based on typical Realme displays) and potentially better color accuracy. While both have a 1190:1 contrast ratio, the Poco X4 GT's higher brightness makes it more enjoyable to use outdoors. The Narzo 50 5G likely uses an LCD panel, while the Poco X4 GT likely uses an AMOLED panel, further enhancing its visual quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, suggesting standard camera setups. However, the Poco X4 GT's more powerful chipset likely allows for better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are missing, making a definitive comparison difficult, but the Poco X4 GT is expected to have a slight edge.
Performance
Here's where the Poco X4 GT truly shines. The Dimensity 8100 is a substantial upgrade over the Dimensity 810, offering significantly faster processing speeds and improved graphics performance. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better gaming experience on the Poco X4 GT. The Narzo 50 5G is adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones claim impressive endurance ratings (112h). However, the Poco X4 GT's 67W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 100% in just 46 minutes. The Narzo 50 5G's 33W charging is slower, taking considerably longer to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
The Realme Narzo 50 5G is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize 5G connectivity and a clean software experience. The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is perfect for gamers, power users, and anyone who values performance, fast charging, and a vibrant display.