Realme Narzo 50 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: Which 5G Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a brighter, more vibrant display and a potentially smoother software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. However, the Realme Narzo 50 5G offers a competitive chipset and faster charging at a potentially lower price, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 50 5G | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 18 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 24 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | RMX3572, RMX3571 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 560 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 50 5G
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Capable Dimensity 810 chipset
- Likely inferior display quality
- Less established brand reputation
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More powerful Exynos 1280 chipset
- Stronger brand reputation and software support
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 830 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for smartphone users. While the Narzo 50 5G’s display specifications are not provided, Samsung’s Super AMOLED panel, coupled with its 'Infinite' contrast ratio, will deliver deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The A53’s larger display size (typically 6.5 inches vs. the Narzo’s likely 6.6 inch) also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn't as efficient, but the A53's superior panel quality is the defining factor.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. The Galaxy A53 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s well-tuned image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor (typical for Samsung A-series phones). The Narzo 50 5G’s camera system is less known, and the inclusion of a 2MP macro lens is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience. The A53’s optical image stabilization (OIS) is a key advantage, resulting in sharper images and smoother videos, especially in low-light conditions. Without detailed sensor size information for the Narzo 50 5G, the A53 5G is the likely winner in overall camera performance.
Performance
Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs, but the architectural differences are noteworthy. The Galaxy A53 5G’s Exynos 1280 features Cortex-A78 cores, a step up from the Cortex-A76 cores found in the Narzo 50 5G’s Dimensity 810. This translates to better single-core performance, beneficial for everyday tasks and app responsiveness. The Dimensity 810, built on a 6nm process, is still a capable chip, but the Exynos 1280’s 5nm fabrication should offer improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the Exynos 1280’s GPU will likely provide a more noticeable advantage in graphically demanding games.
Battery Life
Both the Realme Narzo 50 5G and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Narzo 50 5G’s 33W wired charging is significantly faster than the A53 5G’s 25W charging. This means the Narzo 50 5G can replenish its battery from 0-100% in a shorter timeframe, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need to top up their devices. While the A53 5G’s battery life is respectable, the faster charging of the Narzo 50 5G provides a tangible benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 50 5G if you need a phone that prioritizes raw processing power for gaming and multitasking, and if fast 33W charging is a key requirement. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display, a more established brand reputation, and a potentially longer software support lifecycle, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed.