Realme Narzo 50 5G vs Realme 9 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 920 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Narzo 50 5G’s Dimensity 810, and the 60W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Narzo 50 5G offers excellent value, the 9 Pro+ delivers a more refined and capable experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 50 5G | Realme 9 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 18 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 24 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | RMX3572, RMX3571 | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9) GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 50 5G
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity for future-proof networking
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speeds (33W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the 9 Pro+
- Likely lower quality display
Realme 9 Pro+
- Faster and more powerful Dimensity 920 chipset
- Significantly faster 60W charging
- Potentially superior display quality
- Higher price tag
- May not be a substantial upgrade for basic users
- No specific details on battery capacity
Display Comparison
The Realme 9 Pro+ boasts an unspecified, but likely higher quality, display with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting a strong emphasis on vibrant colors and deep blacks. While the Narzo 50 5G’s display specifications are absent, it’s reasonable to assume a standard LCD panel. The 9 Pro+'s potential for higher peak brightness and superior color accuracy would be noticeable for media consumption. The lack of detailed display specs on the Narzo 50 5G suggests it’s an area where Realme cut costs.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but the Realme 9 Pro+ likely features a more sophisticated camera system. While both phones likely share similar image processing algorithms, the 9 Pro+ benefits from the more powerful ISP within the Dimensity 920, enabling faster processing and potentially better low-light performance. The absence of details on OIS or sensor size for either phone makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the 9 Pro+'s chipset suggests a more capable imaging pipeline. We can assume the 9 Pro+ will have better video recording capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm), featuring a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Narzo 50 5G’s Dimensity 810 (6nm) and its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to approximately a 10-15% performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks and a more substantial improvement in GPU performance, benefiting gamers. Both chips are built on a 6nm process, offering good efficiency, but the Dimensity 920’s architectural improvements provide a clear advantage. The 9 Pro+ is better equipped for sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+’s 60W wired charging is a significant advantage, advertised to reach 100% in just 44 minutes. The Narzo 50 5G’s 33W charging is considerably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the 9 Pro+ mitigates any potential capacity difference. The 9 Pro+ also boasts an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting optimized power management alongside its faster charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 50 5G if you prioritize affordability and 5G access without demanding top-tier performance. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you value faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, quicker charging speeds, and a more premium overall experience, even if it means spending a bit more.