The Realme Narzo 30 and Realme 8 Pro represent Realme’s approach to delivering competitive features at accessible price points. While both aim to provide a solid smartphone experience, they diverge in their core strengths. The Narzo 30 prioritizes gaming performance with its Helio G95 chipset, while the 8 Pro focuses on a balanced experience with the Snapdragon 720G and faster charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around usability and faster charging, the Realme 8 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 720G offers a more efficient experience, and the 50W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, gamers on a tight budget may find the Narzo 30’s Helio G95 a compelling option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 18 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 20 | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.4 x 9.4 mm (6.39 x 2.97 x 0.37 in) | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 580 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 65 min | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Racing Blue, Racing Silver | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | RMX2156 | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 116h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 30
- Potentially higher burst CPU performance due to G95's clock speeds.
- More affordable price point (likely).
- Decent battery life (116h endurance).
- Less efficient 12nm chipset.
- Slower 30W charging.
- Limited information on display quality.
Realme 8 Pro
- More efficient 8nm Snapdragon 720G chipset.
- Significantly faster 50W charging.
- Potentially better image processing due to Qualcomm ISP.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds compared to Narzo 30.
- Similar battery life to Narzo 30 despite efficiency gains.
- Limited information on display quality.
Display Comparison
Both the Realme Narzo 30 and Realme 8 Pro feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting standard LCD panels. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the market positioning, it’s likely both utilize 60Hz panels. The absence of information on PWM dimming rates makes it difficult to assess suitability for users sensitive to flicker. The Realme 8 Pro’s potential for better color calibration, based on Realme’s general display tuning, could provide a slightly more visually pleasing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are scarce. The Realme 8 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) which is known for its strong image processing algorithms. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance. The omission of details regarding video recording capabilities (resolution, frame rates, stabilization) hinders a thorough comparison. It's reasonable to assume the 8 Pro has a more refined camera experience due to Qualcomm's ISP.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme Narzo 30’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) boasts a CPU configuration of 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Realme 8 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) with 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver cores. The Snapdragon 720G, built on a smaller 8nm process, generally offers better power efficiency and sustained performance due to improved thermal management. While the G95’s higher clock speeds *may* translate to slightly better burst performance in benchmarks, the 720G’s architecture and efficiency will likely provide a smoother experience during prolonged gaming sessions. The lack of LPDDR5/LPDDR4X RAM specification for either device makes a direct RAM speed comparison impossible.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 116 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life under moderate usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Narzo 30 supports 30W wired charging, taking 65 minutes for a full charge. The Realme 8 Pro, with its 50W wired charging, reaches 50% in just 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes. This significantly faster charging is a major advantage for users who prioritize minimizing downtime. The 8nm process of the Snapdragon 720G also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any minor capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 30 if you are a mobile gamer seeking maximum performance for the price, and are willing to compromise on charging speed. You’ll benefit from the G95’s CPU clock speeds. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you value a balanced experience with efficient performance, significantly faster charging, and a more refined overall user experience. This phone is ideal for everyday users and casual gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G95 in the Narzo 30 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G95, while capable, is built on a 12nm process which is less efficient than the 8nm Snapdragon 720G. This means it's more prone to thermal throttling during prolonged, demanding gaming. While it will deliver good performance initially, expect some performance dips over time.
❓ How much faster is the 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro compared to the 30W charging on the Narzo 30 in real-world use?
The 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro is significantly faster. It can reach 50% charge in just 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes, compared to the Narzo 30’s 65 minutes for a full charge. This translates to less time tethered to a wall and more time using your phone.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro support higher frame rates in popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 720G is capable of handling PUBG Mobile at high frame rates (60fps). However, achieving consistently smooth performance depends on the game settings and the phone's thermal management. The 720G's efficiency should allow for sustained higher frame rates compared to the Narzo 30's G95.
