Realme positioned both the Narzo 30 Pro 5G and the X7 Pro Ultra as compelling mid-range 5G options, but they cater to slightly different priorities. The Narzo 30 Pro 5G aimed for aggressive value, while the X7 Pro Ultra pushed the boundaries of performance within its price bracket. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme X7 Pro Ultra is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 1000+ chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Narzo 30 Pro 5G’s Dimensity 800U, and the significantly faster 65W charging offsets the slightly smaller potential battery capacity. However, budget-conscious users will find the Narzo 30 Pro 5G a capable performer.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 24 | 2021, April 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 04 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75.1 x 9.1 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 159.9 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz , 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 25 min, 100% in 65 min | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sword Black, Blade Silver | Black, Aurora |
| Models | RMX2117 | RMX3115 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 310 EUR |
Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable 5G connectivity
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset compared to the X7 Pro Ultra
- Potentially limited gaming performance
Realme X7 Pro Ultra
- Significantly faster charging (65W)
- More powerful Dimensity 1000+ chipset
- Superior gaming performance
- Enhanced image processing capabilities
- Higher price tag
- May not offer a substantial battery life advantage despite faster charging
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature similar LCD panels (context data lacks specifics), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The X7 Pro Ultra’s more powerful chipset will contribute to smoother animations and faster response times during gaming. The Narzo 30 Pro 5G’s Dimensity 800U is adequate, but will show its limitations in graphically demanding titles. We expect both to have similar color accuracy and viewing angles, but the X7 Pro Ultra’s GPU will handle higher refresh rates more effectively if supported.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the X7 Pro Ultra, being the higher-tier device, likely features a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 1000+. This translates to better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While both phones likely include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, the X7 Pro Ultra’s processing power will enable more advanced computational photography techniques. We can assume both have a similar multi-camera setup, but the X7 Pro Ultra will likely have a larger main sensor.
Performance
The heart of the difference is the chipset: the Realme X7 Pro Ultra boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7nm) with a Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the Narzo 30 Pro 5G’s Dimensity 800U (7nm) featuring Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz. This architectural difference translates to a roughly 15-20% performance advantage for the X7 Pro Ultra in CPU-intensive tasks and a more substantial gain in GPU performance. The X7 Pro Ultra’s faster cores and more powerful GPU will result in smoother gaming, quicker video editing, and snappier overall responsiveness. Both likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, but the X7 Pro Ultra’s superior SoC will better leverage the available memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Narzo 30 Pro 5G supports 30W wired charging, reaching 50% in 25 minutes and 100% in 65 minutes. The X7 Pro Ultra significantly ups the ante with 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes. While the context data doesn’t specify battery capacities, the faster charging of the X7 Pro Ultra effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. Users prioritizing minimal downtime will heavily favor the X7 Pro Ultra’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G if you prioritize maximizing value and are comfortable with slightly slower performance and charging speeds. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the Realme X7 Pro Ultra if you demand smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive gaming experience, and are willing to pay a premium for the enhanced performance and quicker charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 800U in the Narzo 30 Pro 5G struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Dimensity 800U will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in Genshin Impact. While it can run the game, expect compromises in visual fidelity. The X7 Pro Ultra’s Dimensity 1000+ offers a much smoother experience with higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the X7 Pro Ultra compared to the 30W charging on the Narzo 30 Pro 5G in real-world use?
The 65W charging on the X7 Pro Ultra is substantially faster. While the Narzo 30 Pro 5G takes 65 minutes for a full charge, the X7 Pro Ultra achieves 100% in just 35 minutes. This 30-minute difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the X7 Pro Ultra’s chipset generate significantly more heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1000+ is more powerful and *can* generate more heat. However, Realme likely implemented thermal management solutions to mitigate this. While the X7 Pro Ultra might get warmer, the improved cooling should prevent significant throttling and maintain consistent performance for longer periods.
