Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G vs Realme GT Neo 3T: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Neo 3T emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 870 chipset, blazing-fast 80W charging, and brighter display. While the Narzo 30 Pro 5G offers decent value, the GT Neo 3T provides a superior overall experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 24 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 04 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75.1 x 9.1 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz , 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 25 min, 100% in 65 min | 80W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sword Black, Blade Silver | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | RMX2117 | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G
- Good value for money
- 5G connectivity
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Fast charging (30W)
- Less powerful processor
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging compared to GT Neo 3T
- Potentially less impressive camera
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Excellent performance for gaming
- Good camera performance
- Potentially higher price
- Design might not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 803 nits peak brightness compared to the Narzo 30 Pro 5G's likely lower brightness (spec not provided, estimated around 450-500 nits). The GT Neo 3T's 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests excellent image quality, while the Narzo 30 Pro 5G's display is likely adequate but not exceptional. Both likely use AMOLED panels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the GT Neo 3T likely holds an advantage. While specific camera specs are missing, the Snapdragon 870 often pairs with better image processing capabilities. Expect slightly better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance from the GT Neo 3T. Both likely offer similar primary sensor resolution (around 64MP).
Performance
Here's where the GT Neo 3T truly shines. The Snapdragon 870 is a powerhouse, offering substantially better performance than the Dimensity 800U. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly improved gaming performance on the GT Neo 3T. The Narzo 30 Pro 5G is capable for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with an endurance rating of 118h. However, the GT Neo 3T's 80W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging speeds (potentially 0-100% in around 35 minutes). The Narzo 30 Pro 5G's 30W charging is still respectable, but considerably slower.
Buying Guide
The Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G is a good choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize 5G connectivity and a reliable, albeit less powerful, processor. The Realme GT Neo 3T is ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone who values performance, fast charging, and a vibrant display.