Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset provides a noticeable edge in processing power, and the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Moto G 5G Plus offers comparable battery endurance and a solid overall experience for those less concerned with peak performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 24 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 04 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75.1 x 9.1 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz , 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 25 min, 100% in 65 min | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sword Black, Blade Silver | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | RMX2117 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G
- Faster charging with 30W support
- Potentially better gaming performance due to Dimensity 800U
- Stronger CPU performance for multitasking
- Battery capacity not specified
- Camera specifications are unknown
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Excellent battery endurance (114h rating)
- Higher peak display brightness (543 nits)
- Balanced and reliable performance
- Slower charging at 20W
- Less powerful chipset compared to Dimensity 800U
Display Comparison
Both phones share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, which will provide better visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays are adequate, the Narzo 30 Pro 5G’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. The Moto G 5G Plus’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both phones offer a standard set of camera features for their price point, but the Narzo 30 Pro 5G’s chipset may provide slightly better image processing capabilities due to its more powerful ISP. The lack of detail makes it difficult to assess the real-world camera performance of either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 800U, built on a 7nm process, while the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G, also on a 7nm node. The Dimensity 800U’s CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – suggests a slight advantage in single-core performance compared to the Snapdragon 765’s 1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking for the Narzo 30 Pro 5G. The Dimensity 800U also generally offers a more capable GPU, benefiting gaming performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 30W wired charging (with PD support, reaching 50% in 25 minutes and 100% in 65 minutes) offers a significant advantage over the Moto G 5G Plus’s 20W charging. While the Moto G 5G Plus may last longer on a single charge, the Narzo 30 Pro 5G’s faster charging allows for quicker top-ups, reducing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 30 Pro 5G if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value quick charging to minimize downtime. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prioritize long battery life and a balanced, reliable experience without the need for top-tier processing power. The Moto G 5G Plus is also a better choice for users who prefer a more refined software experience.