Realme Narzo 30 5G vs Oppo Reno7 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster chipset, vastly superior charging speeds, and a brighter display. While the Narzo 30 5G offers a more budget-friendly entry point, the Reno7 5G's premium features justify its higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Narzo 30 5G | Oppo Reno7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 26 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 11 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 74.8 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Racing Blue, Racing Silver | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | RMX3242 | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 30 5G
- Affordable price
- 5G connectivity
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Good battery life
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Average display quality
- Camera performance not exceptional
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Incredibly fast charging (65W)
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Likely superior camera system
- Premium design
- Higher price
- Battery life is comparable despite faster charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 5G takes the display crown with its measured 635 nits max brightness, offering a significantly more vibrant and visible screen, especially outdoors. The Narzo 30 5G's display is adequate but lacks the same punch. The Reno7's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors, further enhancing the viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the Oppo Reno7 5G is expected to have a superior camera system. Oppo is known for its image processing and camera features. The Narzo 30 5G's camera is functional but likely lacks the Reno7's advanced features and image quality. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Oppo Reno7 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Narzo 30 5G's Dimensity 700. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Reno7. Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs, but the Reno7's Cortex-A78 cores offer a significant performance boost.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Oppo Reno7 5G's 65W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 31 minutes. The Narzo 30 5G's 18W charging is considerably slower.
Buying Guide
The Realme Narzo 30 5G is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize 5G connectivity and a decent performance for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno7 5G is perfect for those seeking a more premium experience with faster performance, a better camera, and incredibly fast charging, willing to spend a bit more.