The Realme Narzo 20 and Motorola Moto G8 Power represent two distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Narzo 20 prioritizes gaming performance with its MediaTek Helio G85 chipset, while the Moto G8 Power focuses on maximizing battery life and providing a reliable, all-day experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the best fit for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and responsiveness, the Realme Narzo 20 is the better choice thanks to its more powerful Helio G85 processor. However, the Motorola Moto G8 Power delivers exceptional battery endurance, making it ideal for users who need a phone that lasts well beyond a single day on a charge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 21. Released 2020, September 28 | 2020, February 07. Released 2020, April 16 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame (6000 series) |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.9 x 9.8 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 156 x 75.8 x 9.6 mm (6.14 x 2.98 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ), 560 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glory Silver, Victory Blue | Smoke Black, Capri Blue |
| Models | RMX2193 | XT2041-1, XT2041-3 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 136h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1466:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.6 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 173607 (v8)
GeekBench: 1394 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 20
- More powerful processor for gaming
- Faster app loading and multitasking
- Potentially better gaming experience
- Battery life likely shorter than Moto G8 Power
- Camera specs are unknown
- Display details are missing
Motorola Moto G8 Power
- Exceptional battery life (136h endurance)
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- 18W fast charging
- Less powerful processor for gaming
- Slower app loading times
- Camera specs are unknown
Display Comparison
Both the Realme Narzo 20 and Motorola Moto G8 Power share a nominal contrast ratio of 1466:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like resolution, brightness, and panel type are missing for the Narzo 20. Given the G8 Power's focus on practicality, it likely utilizes an IPS LCD, and the Narzo 20 likely does as well. Without further data, it's difficult to assess which offers superior viewing angles or color accuracy. The G8 Power's contrast ratio indicates a decent, if not exceptional, viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. This makes a direct comparison challenging. However, the omission of details suggests neither phone boasts a flagship-level camera system. The Narzo 20, positioned as a gaming phone, might prioritize image processing for social media sharing, while the G8 Power likely focuses on reliable, everyday photography. Without more data, it's safe to assume both cameras are adequate for casual use but won't excel in low-light conditions or offer advanced features.
Performance
The Realme Narzo 20’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm) chipset offers a performance advantage over the Motorola Moto G8 Power’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The Helio G85’s Cortex-A75 cores, clocked at 2.0 GHz, provide a noticeable boost in single-core performance compared to the Snapdragon 665’s Kryo 260 Gold cores. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural differences and clock speeds translate to smoother multitasking and faster app loading times on the Narzo 20. The 12nm process node on the Helio G85 is slightly less efficient than the 11nm on the Snapdragon 665, potentially leading to slightly higher power consumption under sustained load, but the performance gains are likely worth it for gaming.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G8 Power boasts an impressive endurance rating of 136 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Realme Narzo 20’s battery capacity is unspecified, the G8 Power’s rating suggests it can easily last a full day of heavy use, and potentially two days with moderate usage. Both phones support 18W wired charging, but the G8 Power’s larger battery will naturally take longer to fully charge. The G8 Power’s endurance rating is a significant advantage for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 20 if you frequently play mobile games, value a snappier user experience, and don't mind charging your phone more often. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Power if battery life is your top priority, you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and browsing, and you appreciate a phone that can reliably last through a full day (and then some) without needing a top-up.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme Narzo 20 struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Helio G85 in the Narzo 20 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, but you may need to lower graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The chipset is designed for gaming, but it's still a budget-level processor, so don't expect flagship-level performance.
❓ How long does it realistically take to charge the Motorola Moto G8 Power from 0% to 100%?
While the Moto G8 Power supports 18W fast charging, its large battery capacity means a full charge will likely take around 2.5 to 3.5 hours. The 18W charger is included, but charging speeds may vary depending on the charger and cable used.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs a major concern for either phone?
Yes, the lack of specifics suggests neither phone will be a standout performer in the camera department. Expect adequate results in good lighting conditions, but don't anticipate exceptional low-light performance or advanced features like optical image stabilization.
