The Realme Narzo 10A and Oppo A11k represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at an accessible price, but they diverge significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on how the chipset choices impact real-world performance and user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and occasional gaming, the Realme Narzo 10A is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio G70 chipset offers a substantial performance uplift over the Oppo A11k’s Helio P35, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. While both offer similar battery capacity, the Narzo 10A’s processing power justifies its slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 11. Released 2020, May 22 | 2020, June 22. Released 2020, June 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75 x 9 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 155.9 x 75.5 x 8.3 mm (6.14 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 165 g (5.82 oz) |
| | Weather-sealed ports & loudspeaker | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 28mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
Reverse wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4230 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | So Blue, So White | Flowing Silver, Deep Blue |
| Models | RMX2020 | CPH2083, CPH2071 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | 1.13 W/kg (head) 0.69 W/kg (body) | 1.32 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
Realme Narzo 10A
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and multitasking
- More efficient chipset for better battery life under load
- Potential for smoother software experience
- May be slightly more expensive than the Oppo A11k
- Software updates may be less frequent than Oppo
Oppo A11k
- Potentially lower price point
- Oppo’s established brand reputation and software support
- Simple and user-friendly interface
- Noticeably slower processor for demanding tasks
- Less efficient chipset leading to shorter battery life under load
- Struggles with multitasking and modern games
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing, we can infer both likely utilize standard LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of specifications like resolution or refresh rate suggests a focus on cost reduction. Bezels are likely comparable, prioritizing screen real estate over premium aesthetics. Color accuracy will likely be standard for the segment, leaning towards warmer tones for wider appeal.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price point, both devices likely feature a primary camera paired with depth or macro sensors of limited utility. The image processing capabilities will likely differ, with Realme often favoring more vibrant, social media-ready images, while Oppo tends towards more natural color reproduction. The chipset difference indirectly impacts camera performance; the Helio G70’s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Narzo 10A will likely result in faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme Narzo 10A’s Mediatek Helio G70, built on a 12nm process, features an octa-core configuration with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture prioritizes performance with the A75 cores providing a significant boost in single-core tasks and gaming. Conversely, the Oppo A11k’s Helio P35 also uses a 12nm process but employs a less efficient octa-core setup of 4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While the P35’s higher clock speed *appears* advantageous, the older A53 architecture lacks the performance-per-watt efficiency of the A75, resulting in lower overall responsiveness and gaming capabilities. The Narzo 10A will demonstrably outperform the A11k in CPU-intensive tasks and graphically demanding games.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature similar battery capacities, typical for this segment (around 5000mAh, based on market trends). However, the Narzo 10A’s more efficient Helio G70 chipset will translate to better battery life under load. While both support 10W charging, the Narzo 10A’s chipset will likely complete tasks faster, reducing overall screen-on time and thus, power consumption. The A11k, despite potentially having a slightly larger battery, will likely require more frequent charging due to its less efficient processor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 10A if you need a phone capable of handling moderate gaming, smoother multitasking, and future-proofing against app updates. It’s ideal for students or users who frequently switch between applications. Buy the Oppo A11k if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize simplicity and potentially longer software support from Oppo’s established ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme Narzo 10A handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G70 in the Narzo 10A is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with acceptable frame rates. However, don't expect a flagship-level experience; you may need to lower graphics settings for smoother gameplay. The Oppo A11k’s Helio P35 will struggle with these titles, likely requiring significant compromises in graphics quality and frame rates.
❓ Does the Oppo A11k have enough processing power for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the Oppo A11k’s Helio P35 is sufficient for basic tasks like web browsing, social media, and messaging. However, expect some lag when opening multiple apps or switching between them. It’s best suited for users with minimal demands on their smartphone.
❓ Which phone is better for long-term software support?
Oppo generally provides more consistent software updates and security patches compared to Realme, particularly for their A-series devices. While neither phone is guaranteed to receive extensive updates, the Oppo A11k likely has a slight edge in this regard.
