Realme GT7 Pro Racing vs. Samsung Galaxy S24+: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and incredibly fast charging, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing is the clear winner. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ delivers a more polished, all-around experience with superior battery life and a more versatile camera system, making it the better choice for the average user.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT7 Pro Racing | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 13 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 13 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.40 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 158.5 x 75.9 x 7.7 mm (6.24 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 196 g or 197 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1500 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520)10-core (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) - USA/Canada/ChinaExynos 2400 (4 nm) - International |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) - USA/Canada/ChinaXclipse 940 - International |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 13 min to 50%, 38 min to 100% Bypass charging | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Ion 4900 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium, Blue | Onyx Black, Marble Grey, Cobalt Violet, Amber Yellow, Jade Green, Sandstone Orange, Sapphire Blue |
| Models | - | SM-S926B, SM-S926B/DS, SM-S926U, SM-S926U1, SM-S926W, SM-S926N, SM-S9260, SM-S926E, SM-S926E/DS |
| Price | About 400 EUR | $ 429.50 / € 549.00 / £ 445.98 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- Unmatched processing power with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Potential for superior thermal management due to 3nm process
- Battery life may be shorter than the S24+
- Camera system may lack the refinement of Samsung’s
Samsung Galaxy S24+
- Excellent battery life (12:30h active use)
- Refined software experience and ecosystem integration
- Versatile and reliable camera system
- Slower charging speed (45W wired)
- Performance may be slightly lower than the GT7 Pro Racing
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24+ boasts a peak brightness of 1452 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the GT7 Pro Racing’s display specs are currently unavailable, Realme typically utilizes high-quality AMOLED panels. The S24+’s display technology is likely LTPO, enabling adaptive refresh rates for improved power efficiency. Samsung’s color accuracy is renowned, and the S24+ likely benefits from this, offering a more color-accurate experience than the GT7 Pro Racing, assuming the latter doesn’t employ similar calibration techniques. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both devices, reflecting current flagship trends.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy S24+ is expected to feature a sophisticated camera system with advanced image processing capabilities. While specific sensor details are unavailable for the GT7 Pro Racing, Samsung’s strength lies in its computational photography. The S24+ likely employs a larger main sensor and robust Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for superior low-light performance and video stabilization. The S24+’s camera excels in both photo and video capture, offering a consistent and reliable experience. The GT7 Pro Racing will likely focus on delivering vibrant, punchy images, but may lack the refinement of Samsung’s image processing. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and offers minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT7 Pro Racing features the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), utilizing Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This architecture is designed for peak performance. The Galaxy S24+ uses either the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) or the Exynos 2400 (4nm), depending on the region. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is a formidable chip, the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Oryon cores are expected to deliver superior single-core and multi-core performance. The 3nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite also provides a thermal advantage, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load. The S24+’s CPU configuration, with its Cortex-X4 and A720 cores, is optimized for a balance of performance and efficiency, but likely won’t match the raw speed of the GT7 Pro Racing. Both devices will likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the GT7 Pro Racing’s faster processor will be able to leverage it more effectively.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24+ achieves an impressive 12:30h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life. The Realme GT7 Pro Racing compensates for a potentially smaller battery with its blazing-fast 120W wired charging, reaching 50% in just 13 minutes and 100% in 38 minutes, including bypass charging. The S24+’s 45W charging is significantly slower, taking 30 minutes to reach 65%. While the S24+ offers 15W wireless and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, the GT7 Pro Racing’s wired charging speed is a game-changer for users who prioritize minimizing downtime. The S24+'s larger battery capacity, combined with the efficiency of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 or Exynos 2400, provides a longer-lasting experience overall.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT7 Pro Racing if you demand the absolute fastest Android performance for gaming and demanding tasks, and value 120W charging for minimal downtime. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24+ if you prioritize a refined software experience, a consistently excellent camera, and all-day battery life, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance.