Realme GT7 (China) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficient charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro emerges as the winner. While the Realme GT7’s Dimensity 9400+ boasts impressive peak CPU speeds, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm process and optimized thermal management provide a more consistent experience, coupled with faster 120W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT7 (China) | Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 23 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 23 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 1800 nits (HBM), 6500 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired Bypass charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | - | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 430 EUR |
Realme GT7 (China)
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 9400+
- Fast 100W wired charging
- Bypass charging for reduced battery degradation
- Dimensity 9400+ may suffer from thermal throttling under sustained load
- Less efficient 3nm process compared to Snapdragon's 4nm
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- More efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset
- Faster 120W wired charging with PD3.0/QC3+ support
- Likely better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency
- Potentially lower peak CPU performance compared to the GT7
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
While display specs aren't provided, both devices are expected to feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels typical of flagships. The key difference will likely lie in peak brightness and color calibration. The Redmi K70 Pro, given Xiaomi’s history, will likely push for higher peak brightness for HDR content. Realme often focuses on color accuracy, so expect a vibrant, well-tuned display on the GT7. The absence of LTPO information suggests both may not have adaptive refresh rates, impacting battery life during static content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Xiaomi generally prioritizes larger sensors and advanced image processing. The Redmi K70 Pro is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system with better low-light performance and dynamic range. Realme often focuses on computational photography, so the GT7 might excel in specific scenarios like portrait mode. The absence of information regarding OIS is a key omission; its presence on either device would be a significant advantage.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Realme GT7’s Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) features a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz, suggesting a focus on single-core performance. The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.3 GHz. While the Dimensity has a clock speed advantage, the Snapdragon’s 4nm process offers superior thermal efficiency. This means the K70 Pro is likely to sustain peak performance for longer periods without significant throttling. The Dimensity 9400+'s architecture, with its three X4 cores, could excel in multi-threaded tasks, but the Snapdragon’s optimized architecture and process node will likely provide a more balanced experience. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the Snapdragon’s integrated AI engine provides an additional performance boost in compatible applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a clear advantage, promising a full charge in just 18 minutes. The Realme GT7’s 100W charging is still fast, but noticeably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s efficiency will likely translate to better battery life on the K70 Pro, even with a similar capacity. The K70 Pro also supports PD3.0 and QC3+, offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT7 (China) if you absolutely need the highest possible benchmark scores and are willing to potentially manage thermal throttling during extended, demanding tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you prioritize a smoother, more consistent gaming experience, faster charging speeds, and a more refined overall user experience without sacrificing top-tier performance.