Realme GT7 (China) vs Oppo Find X7: A Deep Dive into Mediatek's Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and potentially longer sustained gaming sessions, the Realme GT7 (China) with its Dimensity 9400+ offers a slight edge. However, the Oppo Find X7’s refined charging experience and potentially better thermal management make it a strong contender, especially for everyday use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT7 (China) | Oppo Find X7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 23 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 23 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 1800 nits (HBM), 6500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired Bypass charging | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple |
| Models | - | PHZ110 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 520 EUR |
Realme GT7 (China)
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9400+
- More efficient 3nm process for better power management
- Bypass charging for potentially improved battery health
- Potential for higher thermal throttling under sustained load
- Camera performance likely inferior to Oppo Find X7
Oppo Find X7
- Refined charging experience with documented charging times
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Likely superior camera system based on Oppo’s brand reputation
- Slightly less powerful CPU compared to the Dimensity 9400+
- May not sustain peak performance as long as the GT7
Display Comparison
Display specifications are currently unavailable for both devices. However, given Oppo’s history with high-quality panels, the Find X7 likely features a display with excellent color accuracy and brightness. Realme typically focuses on high refresh rates, so the GT7 may prioritize smoothness. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume both will offer AMOLED panels, but the Find X7 may have a slight advantage in calibration and overall visual refinement due to Oppo’s display expertise.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are currently unavailable. However, Oppo’s Find X series is renowned for its camera capabilities, suggesting the Find X7 will likely feature a sophisticated camera system with a large main sensor and advanced image processing. Realme, while improving, typically prioritizes value over outright camera prowess. Therefore, the Find X7 is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of details prevents a deeper analysis, but Oppo’s brand reputation suggests a clear advantage in this area.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT7 (China) utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, built on a 3nm process, featuring a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz. This contrasts with the Oppo Find X7’s Dimensity 9300, fabricated on a 4nm node, with a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.25 GHz. The 3nm process of the 9400+ *should* translate to improved power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance, despite the slightly lower clock speed. The GT7’s CPU configuration (1x X925, 3x X4, 4x A720) also suggests a stronger focus on peak performance compared to the Find X7’s (1x X4, 3x X4, 4x A720). Both devices will likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, but the GT7’s more advanced chipset could allow for more efficient memory management.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 100W wired charging, but the implementation differs. The Oppo Find X7 explicitly states 50% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 26 minutes. The Realme GT7 (China) advertises 'bypass charging', which likely means charging directly to the battery, bypassing heat generation from the charging IC, potentially extending battery lifespan. While both offer rapid charging, the Find X7 provides concrete charging time figures. The actual battery capacity is unknown for both, but the efficiency gains from the Dimensity 9400+ in the GT7 could offset a potentially smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT7 (China) if you demand the absolute latest in processing power and are willing to potentially manage thermals for peak performance. It’s ideal for hardcore mobile gamers and power users. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you prioritize a balanced experience with fast, efficient charging and a potentially more stable thermal profile, making it better suited for daily tasks and extended use.