Realme GT5 240W vs. Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate: A Deep Dive into Speed and Gaming
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing everyday use and rapid top-ups, the Realme GT5 240W is the winner. Its 240W charging is a game-changer, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides ample power. However, serious mobile gamers will find the ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s superior cooling and gaming-centric features more valuable.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT5 240W | Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (Up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 28 | 2023, April 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September 04 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.4 x 8.9 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 173 x 77 x 10.3 mm (6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 239 g (8.43 oz) |
| - | Built-in motorized cooling air vent (AeroActive Portal) IP54 water resistant 2" OLED display (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 1TB 24GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 NTFS support for external storage | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L2+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), DisplayPort 1.4; USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 240W wired, PD, 20% in 80 sec | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Flowing Silver, Starry Oasis | Storm White |
| Models | RMX3823 | - |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1325105 (v9) GeekBench: 5139 (v5.5), 5567 (v6) GFXBench: 107fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT5 240W
- Blazing-fast 240W charging
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Sleek and modern design
- Lower battery endurance rating
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Limited gaming-specific features
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
- Superior battery endurance
- Advanced cooling system for sustained performance
- Dedicated gaming features (AirTriggers, high refresh rate)
- Slower 65W charging
- Bulkier design
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays capable of reaching approximately 1100 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. However, the ROG Phone 7 Ultimate boasts an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deeper blacks and a more vibrant image. While both utilize high-quality panels, the ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s gaming focus likely translates to a higher PWM dimming rate, potentially reducing eye strain during prolonged use, though this requires independent verification. The lack of LTPO on either device means refresh rate scaling isn't as efficient as on some competitors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are absent. Given the ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s history, it likely prioritizes image processing geared towards vibrant colors and social media sharing. The Realme GT5, while also capable, may lean towards a more natural color profile. Without sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to definitively assess image quality, but the ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s brand positioning suggests a more refined camera experience, even if the hardware is similar. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely inconsequential.
Performance
Both the Realme GT5 240W and the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), utilizing the same CPU core configuration. This means raw processing power is virtually identical. The ROG Phone 7 Ultimate, however, benefits from Asus’s advanced cooling system – a combination of vapor chamber and graphite sheets – designed to mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Realme GT5, while capable, is likely to experience more performance degradation under sustained load due to its less robust cooling solution. The ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s LPDDR5x RAM is standard for this class, and its impact on performance is minimal compared to the cooling system.
Battery Life
The Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate boasts a superior endurance rating of 131 hours compared to the Realme GT5 240W’s 108 hours, indicating a more efficient battery system. However, the GT5’s 240W wired charging is a revolutionary feature, capable of adding 20% charge in just 80 seconds. The ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s 65W charging, while still fast, takes 42 minutes for a full charge. This difference is significant; the GT5 allows for quick top-ups throughout the day, while the ROG Phone 7 Ultimate requires a longer charging commitment. The ROG Phone 7 Ultimate also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the GT5.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT5 240W if you need the absolute fastest charging available and value a sleek design with flagship performance for everyday tasks. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate if you prioritize extended gaming sessions, demand the best possible thermal management under load, and appreciate dedicated gaming features like AirTriggers and a high-refresh-rate display.