Realme GT2 vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed and incredibly fast charging, the Realme GT2 is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 6 Pro’s superior software experience, and unique camera processing make it the better choice for those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem and photographic capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT2 | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 04 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 08 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 194.5 / 199.8 g (6.88 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | RMX3310, RMX3312, RMX3311 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 790 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 115h | Endurance rating 84h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 810512 (v9) GeekBench: 3487 (v5.1) GFXBench: 56fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT2
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- Stronger raw CPU performance (Snapdragon 888)
- Longer battery endurance (115h rating)
- Lacks LTPO display for dynamic refresh rate
- Software experience less refined than Pixel
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Superior camera image processing and features
- Seamless Google software experience
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower charging speeds (23W wired)
- Shorter battery endurance (84h rating)
Display Comparison
Both the Realme GT2 and Google Pixel 6 Pro boast impressive displays, both peaking at 846 nits of measured brightness. While both have an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the lack of LTPO technology in the GT2 means it cannot dynamically adjust its refresh rate for power savings like some other flagships. This impacts battery life during less demanding tasks. The Pixel 6 Pro’s display benefits from Google’s color calibration, potentially offering more accurate color reproduction, though this is subjective and dependent on user preference.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but approach photography differently. The Pixel 6 Pro leverages Google’s computational photography expertise, delivering consistently excellent results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While specific sensor details are missing for the GT2, the Pixel 6 Pro’s larger main sensor and advanced image processing algorithms provide a noticeable advantage in dynamic range and detail. The Tensor chip’s dedicated image signal processor (ISP) further enhances the Pixel 6 Pro’s photographic capabilities, enabling features like Magic Eraser and Motion Mode. The GT2’s camera is likely more reliant on hardware specifications, while the Pixel 6 Pro prioritizes software optimization.
Performance
The Realme GT2 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. The Pixel 6 Pro utilizes Google’s in-house Tensor chip (also 5nm). While the Tensor chip features a similar core configuration with two Cortex-X1 cores at 2.80 GHz, its strength lies in its dedicated AI and machine learning capabilities. In raw CPU benchmarks, the Snapdragon 888 generally edges out the Tensor, but the Tensor excels in tasks leveraging its AI processing, such as image processing and voice recognition. The GT2’s Adreno 660 GPU provides a strong gaming experience, while the Pixel 6 Pro’s GPU is less focused on raw power and more on optimized performance within Google’s ecosystem.
Battery Life
Battery life is a significant differentiator. The Realme GT2’s endurance rating of 115 hours significantly surpasses the Pixel 6 Pro’s 84 hours. This is despite the Pixel 6 Pro offering both 23W wired and 23W wireless charging, plus reverse wireless charging. The GT2’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 33 minutes, compared to the Pixel 6 Pro’s 50% charge in 30 minutes. The faster charging speed effectively mitigates the GT2’s slightly smaller battery capacity, making it more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT2 if you need a powerful phone for gaming and demanding tasks, and value blazing-fast 65W charging. It’s ideal for users who prioritize performance-per-dollar. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional camera features powered by Google’s Tensor chip, and don’t mind slower charging speeds in exchange for a more polished overall package.