Realme GT2 Pro vs. Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the Realme GT2 Pro thanks to its brighter display, more efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chip, and faster charging. While the GT2 Pro boasts excellent battery life, the F5 Pro's overall performance and features make it the slightly better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT2 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China, India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 04 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 08 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 / 199 g (6.67 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (dual side) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue | Black, White |
| Models | RMX3301, RMX3300 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | € 221.41 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 117h | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.3 LUFS (Good) | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 966251 (v9) GeekBench: 3501 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT2 Pro
- Exceptional battery life
- Unique and stylish design
- Fast 65W charging
- Good overall performance
- Slightly older chipset
- Lower peak brightness compared to F5 Pro
- Camera performance may not be class-leading
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Faster charging (wired and wireless)
- Excellent value for money
- Slightly shorter battery life than GT2 Pro
- Design may be less distinctive
- Camera performance may not match top-tier flagships
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 1059 nits significantly surpasses the Realme GT2 Pro's 778 nits, resulting in better outdoor visibility and a more vibrant viewing experience. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the Poco's brightness is a noticeable advantage. Both use AMOLED panels, so color accuracy and viewing angles are generally excellent.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and requires more in-depth testing. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed comparisons would require extensive testing. Generally, the Poco F5 Pro is expected to have slightly better image processing and low-light performance due to the newer chipset. Both likely offer versatile camera setups with wide, ultrawide, and potentially telephoto lenses.
Performance
The Poco F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a more efficient and powerful chipset than the GT2 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. While both offer flagship-level performance, the 8+ Gen 1 generally handles demanding tasks and games with greater ease and less throttling. Both phones feature the same CPU configuration, but the 8+ Gen 1's improved architecture provides a tangible performance boost.
Battery Life
The Realme GT2 Pro holds a slight advantage in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 117 hours compared to the Poco F5 Pro's 99 hours. However, the Poco F5 Pro's faster charging speeds (67W wired, 30W wireless) significantly reduce charging times, mitigating the difference in endurance.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT2 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and a unique design. The Poco F5 Pro is perfect for those seeking top-tier performance, a vibrant display, and faster charging speeds without breaking the bank.