Realme GT2 Explorer Master vs. Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the Realme GT2 Explorer Master thanks to its significantly brighter display, faster wired and wireless charging, and more versatile charging standards. While the Realme boasts slightly better battery endurance, the Poco's overall package offers a more compelling experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT2 Explorer Master | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 12 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 19 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 74.3 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 150˚ (ultrawide) 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Gold | Black, White |
| Models | RMX3551 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 500 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 126h | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1045876 (v9) GeekBench: 4021 (v5.1) | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT2 Explorer Master
- Exceptional battery life (126h endurance)
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Potentially refined camera (speculative)
- Lower display brightness (798 nits)
- Slower charging speeds (100W wired)
- Camera specs are unclear
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter display (1059 nits)
- Faster charging (67W wired, 30W wireless)
- Modern design
- Versatile charging standards (PD3.0, QC3+)
- Slightly shorter battery life (99h endurance)
- Potentially less refined camera (speculative)
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 1059 nits significantly surpasses the Realme GT2 Explorer Master's 798 nits, resulting in better outdoor visibility and a more immersive viewing experience. Both boast 'infinite' contrast ratios, a nominal value indicating excellent contrast, but the brightness difference is the key factor here. The Poco's display likely utilizes a more advanced panel technology.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively compare based solely on the provided data. Both are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering no specifics on sensor size, aperture, or video recording features. User reviews and independent testing would be needed to determine which phone delivers superior image quality and video recording capabilities. The Realme might have a slight edge based on reputation, but it's speculative.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, ensuring flagship-level performance. While the CPU clock speeds differ slightly (Poco's X2 core is marginally lower), real-world performance will be very similar for most tasks. Gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications will run smoothly on both devices. Differences in thermal management and software optimization could slightly impact sustained performance, but these are difficult to assess without extensive testing.
Battery Life
The Realme GT2 Explorer Master holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 126-hour rating compared to the Poco F5 Pro's 99-hour rating. However, the Poco F5 Pro's significantly faster charging speeds (100W wired vs 67W wired, and the addition of 30W wireless charging) largely negate this difference. Users will spend considerably less time plugged in with the Poco.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT2 Explorer Master is ideal for users prioritizing maximum battery life and a potentially more refined camera experience (though specifics are lacking in provided data). The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is a better choice for those who value a vibrant, high-brightness display, rapid charging capabilities, and a more modern design.