Realme Showdown: GT2 Explorer Master vs. GT Neo 5 240W
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner for charging speed, boasting an incredible 240W capability. However, the GT2 Explorer Master offers a potentially superior display and longer battery endurance. Ultimately, it depends on whether you prioritize blazing-fast charging or a more balanced experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT2 Explorer Master | Realme GT Neo 5 240W |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 12 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 19 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 74.3 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 150˚ (ultrawide) 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Gold | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | RMX3551 | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 126h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1045876 (v9) GeekBench: 4021 (v5.1) | - |
Realme GT2 Explorer Master
- Potentially superior display quality
- Exceptional battery endurance (126h)
- Premium build quality (likely)
- Flagship performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Camera details are limited
- Charging speed is slower compared to Neo 5
- Availability may be limited
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Incredible 240W fast charging (50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min)
- Flagship performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Likely a high-quality display
- Generally more readily available
- Battery endurance may be lower than GT2 Explorer Master
- Camera may not be as advanced
- Potential compromises in build quality to achieve fast charging
Display Comparison
The GT2 Explorer Master boasts a measured peak brightness of 798 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, suggesting a vibrant and high-quality display. While the Neo 5's display specs aren't provided, it's likely to be excellent, but potentially not quite as impressive as the Explorer Master's. We'd expect both to have high refresh rates (likely 120Hz or higher).
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for the GT2 Explorer Master. However, given its 'Master' designation, it likely features a more refined camera system. The Neo 5's camera is expected to be competent, but potentially not as advanced. Further testing would be needed to determine the actual image quality differences.
Performance
Both phones share the same Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and CPU configuration, guaranteeing flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, demanding gaming, and snappy app launches on both devices. Differences in thermal management could slightly impact sustained performance, but both should handle most tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The GT2 Explorer Master claims an astonishing 126-hour endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Neo 5, while not explicitly stating endurance, compensates with its groundbreaking 240W charging, capable of reaching 50% in 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes. This is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT2 Explorer Master is ideal for users who value a premium display, potentially better camera performance (though details are limited), and extended battery life. The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is perfect for those who demand the absolute fastest charging speeds available and don't mind potentially sacrificing some other features.