Realme GT2 Explorer Master vs Oppo Find X5 Pro: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and faster charging, the Realme GT2 Explorer Master is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a noticeable performance edge and superior efficiency, coupled with 100W charging. However, the Oppo Find X5 Pro provides a more polished software experience and potentially better camera versatility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT2 Explorer Master | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 12 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 19 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 74.3 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 150˚ (ultrawide) 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Gold | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | RMX3551 | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 126h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1045876 (v9) GeekBench: 4021 (v5.1) | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT2 Explorer Master
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Faster 100W wired charging
- Longer battery life (126h endurance)
- Potentially less refined software experience
- Lacks wireless charging
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Premium build quality and design
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially more versatile camera system
- Less powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Dimensity 9000
- Shorter battery life (101h endurance)
Display Comparison
Both the Realme GT2 Explorer Master and Oppo Find X5 Pro feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. However, the GT2 Explorer Master boasts a measured peak brightness of 798 nits, slightly exceeding the Find X5 Pro’s 762 nits. While both are excellent, the GT2 Explorer Master’s higher brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO), so we must assume standard high refresh rate OLEDs. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy is likely similar given both brands’ calibration standards.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market positioning suggests the Find X5 Pro likely prioritizes image processing and overall camera versatility, potentially offering more refined color science and computational photography features. The GT2 Explorer Master, geared towards performance, may lean towards a more natural, less processed look. The absence of details regarding sensor size and OIS makes a precise comparison impossible, and any mention of 2MP macro lenses is irrelevant given their limited utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT2 Explorer Master utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), while the Oppo Find X5 Pro ships with either the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) or the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (4nm) depending on the region. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the GT2 Explorer Master offers a clock speed advantage with its 3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 core compared to the Find X5 Pro’s 3.00 GHz (Global) or 3.05 GHz (China) Cortex-X2. This, combined with the more efficient 4nm process, results in better sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The CPU configuration is similar otherwise, but the 8+ Gen 1’s architectural improvements provide a tangible benefit for demanding tasks. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but specific speeds aren't provided.
Battery Life
The Realme GT2 Explorer Master boasts an endurance rating of 126 hours, significantly exceeding the Oppo Find X5 Pro’s 101 hours. This advantage is attributable to both the more efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and potentially a larger battery capacity (though not specified). The GT2 Explorer Master also features significantly faster charging with 100W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the Find X5 Pro’s 80W wired charging (with a claimed 50% charge in 12 minutes). The Find X5 Pro adds the convenience of 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the GT2 Explorer Master.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT2 Explorer Master if you need uncompromising gaming performance, rapid charging speeds, and don't mind a slightly less refined software experience. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you prefer a premium build quality, a more balanced camera system, and the convenience of wireless charging, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.