Realme GT Neo5 SE vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the GT Neo5 SE thanks to its superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, brighter display, and faster wireless charging. While the GT Neo5 SE boasts incredibly fast 100W wired charging, the Poco F5 Pro's overall package is more compelling for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo5 SE | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 03 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 11 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193.1 g (6.81 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gradient | Black, White |
| Models | RMX3700, RMX3701 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo5 SE
- Incredibly fast 100W wired charging
- Competitive price
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Good display quality
- Less powerful chipset than Poco F5 Pro
- Lower peak brightness display
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Brighter and potentially more accurate display
- Wireless charging support
- Excellent battery life
- Slower wired charging than GT Neo5 SE
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured 1059 nits peak brightness significantly outshines the GT Neo5 SE, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While both feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates, the Poco's superior brightness and potentially better color accuracy give it the edge. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio claim on the Poco F5 Pro suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a bit more nuanced. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed comparisons require more in-depth testing. The Poco F5 Pro likely benefits from the more powerful image signal processor (ISP) associated with its chipset, potentially leading to better image quality and video recording capabilities. Both phones likely offer a main sensor around 64MP, but sensor size and software processing are key differentiators.
Performance
The Poco F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a significant performance upgrade over the GT Neo5 SE's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. While both are capable chips, the 8+ Gen 1 offers noticeably faster processing speeds and better graphics performance, making it ideal for demanding games and multitasking. The GT Neo5 SE still provides smooth performance for everyday tasks, but the Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner for power users.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings (99h), suggesting excellent battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The GT Neo5 SE's 100W wired charging is incredibly fast, capable of charging the phone from 0% to 100% in around 30 minutes. The Poco F5 Pro offers 67W wired charging and a 30W wireless charging option, providing more versatility but slower overall charging times.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Neo5 SE is ideal for users prioritizing blazing-fast wired charging and a slightly more budget-friendly price. The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the better choice for those seeking top-tier performance, a vibrant display, and the convenience of wireless charging.