The Realme GT Neo2T and Xiaomi Poco F4 GT represent compelling options in the mid-to-high range of Android smartphones, both aggressively targeting gamers. The Neo2T offers a strong value proposition with its Dimensity 1200, while the Poco F4 GT aims for flagship-level performance with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and blazing-fast 120W charging. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and incredibly fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift, and the 120W charging is a game-changer. However, the Realme GT Neo2T remains a strong contender for budget-conscious gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 19 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| | - | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired
5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | RMX3357 | 21121210G |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 81h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 952124 (v9)
GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Realme GT Neo2T
- More affordable price point
- Respectable performance with Dimensity 1200
- 65W fast charging is still very quick
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers superior performance
- Charging speed is significantly slower than Poco F4 GT
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (0-100% in 17 minutes)
- Likely superior camera system
- Higher price tag
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing. Given the Poco F4 GT’s positioning, it likely boasts a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The Realme GT Neo2T, while still good, may fall slightly behind in this area. Without refresh rate data, it's difficult to assess smoothness, but both are expected to offer at least 120Hz for a fluid gaming experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the Poco F4 GT’s flagship aspirations, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Realme GT Neo2T likely focuses on providing a competent camera experience without pushing the boundaries. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive comparison is impossible, but the Poco F4 GT is expected to deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4 GT’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) is built on a smaller node than the Realme GT Neo2T’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm), translating to improved power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance under load. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core (3.0 GHz) offers a significant architectural advantage over the Dimensity 1200’s Cortex-A78 (3.0 GHz). While both have a 3.0 GHz peak, the X2 is a newer, more efficient design. The Poco also benefits from newer Cortex-A710 cores (2.5 GHz) versus the A78 cores (2.6 GHz) in the Realme. This translates to a clear advantage for the Poco F4 GT in graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones have an endurance rating of 81 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Realme GT Neo2T’s unspecified mAh capacity versus the Poco F4 GT’s. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco F4 GT’s 120W charging can fully charge the device in just 17 minutes, a massive advantage over the Realme GT Neo2T’s 65W charging. This difference is crucial for gamers who need to quickly top up their battery between sessions. The Poco also supports PD3.0 and QC3, offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo2T if you need a balanced phone with solid performance for everyday tasks and gaming, coupled with respectable 65W charging, all at a more affordable price point. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT if you prioritize uncompromising performance for demanding games, need the fastest possible charging speeds (120W), and are willing to pay a premium for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Poco F4 GT suffer from overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to generate more heat than previous generations. However, the Poco F4 GT incorporates advanced cooling solutions, including a vapor chamber, to mitigate thermal throttling. While some heat is expected during extended gaming, the Poco F4 GT is designed to maintain stable performance for longer periods than some other 8 Gen 1 devices.
❓ Is the 65W charging on the Realme GT Neo2T fast enough for most users, or is the 120W on the Poco F4 GT a necessity?
65W charging is still considered fast and will fully charge the Realme GT Neo2T in around 35-40 minutes. However, the 120W charging on the Poco F4 GT is a game-changer, reducing charge times to just 17 minutes. For gamers who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, the 120W charging is a significant advantage.
❓ What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the Dimensity 1200 in the Realme GT Neo2T?
The Dimensity 1200 is a capable chipset that can handle most Android games at high settings. While it doesn't match the raw power of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, it provides a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience for popular titles like PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, and Genshin Impact. Expect stable frame rates and minimal lag.
