Realme GT Neo2T vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and fast charging, the Realme GT Neo2T is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset and 65W charging significantly outperform the Galaxy A73 5G’s Snapdragon 778G and 25W charging. However, the A73 5G offers a more refined software experience and Samsung’s ecosystem benefits.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo2T | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 19 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | RMX3357 | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
Realme GT Neo2T
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset for gaming
- Potentially better thermal management for sustained performance
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
- Camera performance may be less consistent than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Samsung’s refined One UI software experience
- Strong ecosystem integration with other Samsung devices
- Potentially better image processing for consistent photos
- Slower 25W charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset for demanding tasks
- May experience more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature AMOLED panels (based on market segment), specific details like peak brightness and refresh rate are missing. However, the focus here is on performance, so display differences are less critical. The A73 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s display calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate colors out of the box. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price range.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the A73 5G likely features Samsung’s image processing algorithms, known for vibrant colors and good dynamic range. The GT Neo2T’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor and software tuning. Given the focus on performance, Realme may prioritize computational photography to enhance image quality. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording, but this is unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT Neo2T’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core, alongside 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) with its 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This translates to a noticeable advantage for the GT Neo2T in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While both use a 6nm process, the Dimensity 1200’s core configuration provides a performance edge. The GT Neo2T’s potential for higher sustained performance is further enhanced by potentially more aggressive cooling solutions, a common trait in Realme’s ‘GT’ series.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo2T’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in under 40 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G’s 25W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly longer to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the GT Neo2T mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Users who frequently top up their phones will greatly benefit from the GT Neo2T’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo2T if you need a phone for demanding mobile games, frequently transfer large files, or value incredibly fast charging. Its focus is on speed and efficiency. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G if you prefer a more polished software experience, prioritize Samsung’s ecosystem integration, and value a more balanced feature set over outright performance. It’s geared towards everyday users who appreciate reliability and a familiar interface.