Realme GT Neo2T vs Motorola Edge 20 Pro: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT Neo2T emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 65W charging and potent Dimensity 1200 chipset offer a more compelling performance-per-dollar ratio, even if the Edge 20 Pro boasts a slightly brighter screen and comparable battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo2T | Motorola Edge 20 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 19 | 2021, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2021, August 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 185/190 g (depending on color) (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 126mm (periscope telephoto), 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Midnight Blue, Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent Cloud |
| Models | RMX3357 | XT2153-1 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 711090 (v9) GeekBench: 3140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo2T
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 1200
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Display brightness data unavailable
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
- Brighter display (673 nits)
- Potentially better thermal management with Snapdragon 870
- Refined software experience (typical of Motorola)
- Slower 30W charging
- Higher price point for comparable performance
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a display capable of reaching 673 nits of peak brightness, a significant advantage for outdoor use compared to the Neo2T (brightness data unavailable). While the Edge 20 Pro’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘infinite’ (nominal), this is typical marketing language. Both devices likely utilize OLED panels, but the Neo2T’s refresh rate is not specified, potentially giving the Edge 20 Pro an edge in smoothness if it supports a higher refresh rate. The lack of detailed display specs for the Neo2T makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the Edge 20 Pro’s measured brightness is a clear win for visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. The Edge 20 Pro’s image processing is likely tuned for a more natural look, typical of Motorola, while Realme often favors more vibrant, saturated colors. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, offering minimal benefit over the main sensor.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo2T’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) and the Motorola Edge 20 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) represent different approaches to performance. The Dimensity 1200, with its Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, aims for peak CPU performance, while the Snapdragon 870 prioritizes sustained performance and efficiency. The Snapdragon 870’s Kryo 585 cores, though clocked slightly lower at 3.2 GHz, benefit from Qualcomm’s optimized architecture. The 7nm process of the Snapdragon 870 generally translates to better thermal management under prolonged load. However, the Neo2T’s larger L3 cache (not specified, but typical of Dimensity chips) can improve performance in certain workloads. Both devices are capable of handling demanding tasks, but the Edge 20 Pro is likely to maintain higher frame rates for longer periods during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both the Realme GT Neo2T and Motorola Edge 20 Pro share an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Neo2T’s 65W wired charging is significantly faster than the Edge 20 Pro’s 30W charging. This translates to a much quicker 0-100% charge time for the Neo2T, potentially mitigating any slight differences in overall battery capacity. The Neo2T also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Edge 20 Pro, allowing it to top up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo2T if you prioritize fast charging, demanding mobile gaming, and maximizing performance within a budget. You'll benefit from quicker top-ups and a smoother experience in graphically intensive applications. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Pro if you value a brighter display for outdoor visibility and prefer a more refined software experience, potentially with longer software support, though the performance difference is minimal in everyday tasks.