Realme GT Neo2T vs Google Pixel 6a: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed and rapid charging, the Realme GT Neo2T is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 6a delivers a more refined software experience and superior camera capabilities, making it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo2T | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 19 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 5W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | RMX3357 | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 260 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Realme GT Neo2T
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- Potentially higher multi-core performance with Dimensity 1200
- Likely more affordable price point
- Camera performance likely inferior to Pixel 6a
- Software updates may be less frequent and slower
Google Pixel 6a
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Clean and consistently updated Android experience
- Google Tensor chip offers strong AI capabilities
- Slower 18W charging
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 876 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the GT Neo2T (brightness data unavailable). While the GT Neo2T’s panel specifics are unknown, the Pixel 6a’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a superior OLED experience. Both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels, but the Pixel 6a’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. Bezels appear comparable, but the Pixel 6a’s display is smaller, potentially offering a more compact feel for some users.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system is a significant strength, leveraging Google’s renowned computational photography. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Pixel 6a’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The GT Neo2T’s camera specs are less detailed, making a direct comparison difficult. The Pixel 6a’s focus on software optimization and consistent image quality gives it an edge, particularly for casual users. The GT Neo2T may offer more flexibility with manual controls, but the Pixel 6a’s point-and-shoot simplicity is a major draw.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT Neo2T’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) features a tri-cluster configuration with a high-clocked Cortex-A78 core at 3.0 GHz, geared towards sustained performance. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) utilizes a more heterogeneous architecture, with two Cortex-X1 cores clocked at 2.80 GHz. While the Tensor’s X1 cores offer higher single-core performance, the Dimensity 1200’s larger core count and efficient 6nm process could provide an edge in multi-threaded workloads. The Tensor’s strength lies in its dedicated AI processing units, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. Both phones likely feature ample RAM, but the GT Neo2T’s potential for faster LPDDR5 RAM (spec not confirmed) could further boost performance.
Battery Life
Both the Realme GT Neo2T and Google Pixel 6a achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (data unavailable for GT Neo2T). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The GT Neo2T’s 65W wired charging is significantly faster than the Pixel 6a’s 18W charging with PD3.0. This means the GT Neo2T can replenish its battery from 0-100% in a fraction of the time, a crucial advantage for users who prioritize convenience. The Pixel 6a’s slower charging is offset by its efficient Tensor chip and optimized software.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo2T if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or frequent multitasking, and value incredibly fast charging. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you prioritize camera quality, a clean and consistently updated Android experience, and long-term software support, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.