Realme GT Neo2 vs. Xiaomi Poco F4 GT: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and consistent performance, the Realme GT Neo2 is the better choice. Its 111-hour endurance rating significantly outpaces the Poco F4 GT’s 81 hours. However, gamers and power users who demand the absolute fastest processing speeds and don't mind frequent charging will find the Poco F4 GT more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo2 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 22 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 28 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.8 g (7.05 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 36 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Neo Black, Neo Blue, Neo Green | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | RMX3370 | 21121210G |
| Price | About 980 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 111h | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 726039 (v9) GeekBench: 3185 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Realme GT Neo2
- Exceptional battery life (111h endurance)
- Balanced performance from Snapdragon 870
- Respectable 65W fast charging
- Lower peak performance compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Display brightness, while good, isn't class-leading
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 performance
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (17 minutes to full)
- Potentially superior camera system
- Significantly shorter battery life (81h endurance)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 prone to thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, the Realme GT Neo2 boasts a measured peak brightness of 659 nits, which will provide better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Poco F4 GT (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the GT Neo2’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor use. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn't as efficient as on higher-end phones, potentially impacting battery life during dynamic content.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given the market positioning, the Poco F4 GT likely features a more advanced camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is significantly more capable than the 870’s, enabling features like better low-light performance and faster image processing. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Poco F4 GT likely holds an edge in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4 GT’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) offers a theoretical performance advantage over the Realme GT Neo2’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 8 Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.00 GHz, is designed for peak performance, while the 870 relies on a Kryo 585 core at 3.2 GHz. However, the 4nm process of the 8 Gen 1 provides better thermal efficiency, crucial for sustained performance. The 870, while older, is known for its excellent balance of power and efficiency, minimizing throttling. The Poco F4 GT's LPDDR5 RAM is standard for the class, but the GT Neo2's RAM speed is unspecified, potentially impacting multitasking performance.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Realme GT Neo2 truly shines. Its endurance rating of 111 hours is a substantial improvement over the Poco F4 GT’s 81 hours. While the Poco F4 GT compensates with incredibly fast 120W wired charging (0-100% in 17 minutes), the GT Neo2’s 65W charging (0-100% in 36 minutes) is still respectable. The difference in battery endurance means the GT Neo2 can comfortably last a full day of moderate to heavy use, while the Poco F4 GT may require a midday top-up for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo2 if you need exceptional battery life, a smooth and responsive user experience for everyday tasks, and a phone that won't require constant charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT if you prioritize raw gaming performance, the fastest possible charging speeds (100% in 17 minutes), and are willing to trade battery endurance for peak power.