Xiaomi 11T Pro vs Realme GT Neo2: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT Neo2 offers a more balanced package. While the Xiaomi 11T Pro boasts a faster processor and significantly quicker charging, the GT Neo2’s superior battery endurance and competitive performance make it the more practical choice for daily use. The 11T Pro is best for power users who prioritize raw speed and minimal charging downtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo2 | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 22 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 28 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.8 g (7.05 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 36 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Neo Black, Neo Blue, Neo Green | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | RMX3370 | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | About 980 EUR | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 111h | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 726039 (v9) GeekBench: 3185 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Realme GT Neo2
- Superior battery life (111h endurance)
- Competitive Snapdragon 870 performance
- Reasonable 65W fast charging
- Lower peak display brightness
- Less powerful processor than the 11T Pro
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 888 processor
- Significantly faster 120W charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Shorter battery life (92h endurance)
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 11T Pro takes a clear lead in display brightness, achieving a measured peak of 837 nits compared to the Realme GT Neo2’s 659 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. While neither specification details refresh rate or panel type, the brighter display of the 11T Pro provides a more vibrant and usable experience in bright environments. The difference in brightness is substantial enough to be noticeable in everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both employ capable main sensors. The Xiaomi 11T Pro, being the slightly more premium device, *may* have a larger sensor or more advanced image processing algorithms. The absence of detail regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests it may not be a standard feature. Focusing on the main sensor and image processing will be key to differentiating camera performance in a full review.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi 11T Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 888 (5nm process) while the Realme GT Neo2 features the Snapdragon 870 (7nm process). The 888, with its Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, offers a theoretical performance advantage, particularly in single-core tasks. However, the 870’s efficiency is noteworthy. The 5nm node of the 888 generally leads to better thermal efficiency, but the 870’s larger process node doesn’t necessarily translate to significant throttling issues in the GT Neo2, especially given its cooling system. Both phones feature octa-core CPUs, but the architectural differences – Cortex-A55 vs. Kryo 585 cores – contribute to varying performance profiles. The 11T Pro will excel in benchmark scores, but the GT Neo2 provides a very smooth and responsive experience for most applications.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo2 boasts an endurance rating of 111 hours, significantly outperforming the Xiaomi 11T Pro’s 92 hours. This difference is partially offset by the 11T Pro’s blazing-fast 120W charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 17 minutes, compared to the GT Neo2’s 36 minutes with its 65W charging. While the 11T Pro’s charging speed is undeniably impressive, the GT Neo2’s superior battery life means you’ll need to charge it less frequently. The 11T Pro’s faster charging is a convenience, but the GT Neo2’s longer runtime offers a more practical benefit for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo2 if you prioritize all-day battery life, consistent performance under sustained loads, and a more reasonable charging time. It’s ideal for users who game occasionally, stream media, and need a reliable daily driver. Buy the Xiaomi 11T Pro if you absolutely need the fastest possible processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or heavy gaming, and if you value the convenience of incredibly rapid 120W charging, even at the expense of battery longevity.