Realme GT Neo2 vs Realme GT Neo 3T: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Neo 3T edges out the Neo2 thanks to its brighter display and significantly faster 80W charging. While both offer excellent performance thanks to the Snapdragon 870, the Neo 3T’s improvements in display and charging make it the slightly better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo2 | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 22 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 28 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.8 g (7.05 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 36 min | 80W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Neo Black, Neo Blue, Neo Green | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | RMX3370 | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 980 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 111h | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 726039 (v9) GeekBench: 3185 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme GT Neo2
- Slightly longer endurance rating
- Potentially more refined camera color accuracy
- Good value for money
- Slower charging speed
- Lower display brightness
- Design might be less appealing to some
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Faster 80W charging
- Brighter display
- Modern design
- Slightly better endurance rating
- Camera processing might be overly saturated for some
- Price slightly higher than Neo2
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a noticeable advantage in display brightness, measuring 803 nits compared to the Neo2's 659 nits. This makes the Neo 3T's screen easier to view in direct sunlight. Both phones feature AMOLED panels with excellent contrast (infinite nominal), offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Neo 3T's slightly higher refresh rate (120Hz vs 120Hz) is negligible in real-world use.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally similar between the two phones. Both feature a triple-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide lens, and macro lens. While specific sensor details differ slightly, image quality in well-lit conditions is comparable. The Neo2 might have a slight edge in color accuracy in some scenarios, but the Neo 3T's image processing could be more appealing to some. Low-light performance is adequate on both, but not exceptional.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G chipset, ensuring smooth and responsive performance for everyday tasks, gaming, and multitasking. The CPU and GPU configurations are identical, so you shouldn't expect a significant difference in performance between the two. Software optimization might play a minor role, but overall, performance is comparable.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 3T holds a slight advantage in endurance rating (118h vs 111h), suggesting marginally better battery life. However, the Neo 3T's standout feature is its 80W wired charging, which can fully charge the phone in around 36 minutes, significantly faster than the Neo2's 65W charging (36 min). This difference in charging speed is a major factor for many users.
Buying Guide
The Realme GT Neo2 is a great option for those prioritizing slightly longer battery life and a potentially more refined camera experience (though differences are minimal). The Realme GT Neo 3T is ideal for users who value faster charging speeds and a brighter, more vibrant display, especially for outdoor use.