Realme GT Neo vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+: Which Flagship Killer Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. While the Realme GT Neo offers competitive performance, the Snapdragon 888’s superior GPU and overall efficiency, coupled with a potentially more refined software experience, give it the edge. However, the GT Neo’s faster 50W charging is a significant advantage for those prioritizing quick top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme GT Neo | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 31 | 2021, February 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 08 | Available. Released 2021, March 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 50% in 16 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min (advertised) |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora | Black, White, Aurora |
| Models | RMX3031 | - |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 470 EUR |
Realme GT Neo
- Significantly faster 50W charging
- Competitive performance for the price
- Aggressive pricing makes it very accessible
- Dimensity 1200 may throttle under heavy load
- Potentially less refined camera system
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Superior GPU performance for gaming
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slower 33W charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Snapdragon 888 can still generate heat
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display, focusing instead on value. While specific panel details (like peak brightness in nits or color gamut coverage) are absent, both likely utilize AMOLED technology common in this price bracket. The K40 Pro+ may benefit from Qualcomm’s display optimization features, potentially leading to slightly better color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends. The absence of high refresh rate details is a notable omission, but both likely offer at least 120Hz.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Redmi K40 Pro+ likely features a more sophisticated camera system. Xiaomi typically prioritizes camera performance in its 'Pro+' models. The Snapdragon 888’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling better image processing and low-light performance. While both phones likely include standard wide, ultrawide, and macro lenses, the K40 Pro+ may feature a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in sharper, more detailed photos and videos. The Realme GT Neo’s camera is likely competent, but the K40 Pro+ is expected to deliver a more refined photographic experience.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipset battle: MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm). The Snapdragon 888, built on a smaller 5nm process, inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal headroom. While the Dimensity 1200’s Cortex-A78 cores are potent, the Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core provides a noticeable performance uplift in single-core tasks. The GPU is where the Snapdragon 888 truly shines, offering significantly higher graphics processing power. Both phones utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the Snapdragon’s Adreno 660 GPU will deliver a smoother experience in graphically intensive games. The Dimensity 1200 may exhibit more throttling under sustained load due to its larger process node.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo’s 50W wired charging is a clear winner in terms of speed, promising a 50% charge in just 16 minutes. The Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+’s 33W charging, while supporting PD3.0 and QC3, takes a considerably longer 52 minutes to reach 100%. However, the Snapdragon 888’s superior power efficiency may offset the smaller battery capacity (specific mAh values are missing). Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the K40 Pro+ is likely to offer comparable or even slightly better endurance due to its more efficient chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme GT Neo if you prioritize incredibly fast charging and are heavily invested in the Realme UI ecosystem. Its 50W charging will get you back up and running quickly, and the aggressive pricing makes it a compelling option for budget-conscious gamers. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ if you value sustained performance, a potentially smoother software experience (depending on ROM), and a more powerful GPU for demanding games and applications. The Snapdragon 888 offers a more robust platform for long-term use.